SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Compuware (CPWR)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1627 27 0 CPWR
Emcee:  David M. Kaplan Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
52 Going up!Steve Woas-9/15/1997
51 Kevin-- Well. More than a month has passed. CPWR got slammed early in the seJanice Shell-9/14/1997
50 Jim, I thought a week was a decent interval between posts on this sleepy backwaHoatzin-8/4/1997
49 Kevin, I'm lurking. I've only been a long since may 97 but that's ItsAllCyclical-7/27/1997
48 Kevin-- Yes. That seems to be the case. As a public service, I'll keep yJanice Shell-7/24/1997
47 Janice, sounds like you're starting your own "effect". Snap out oHoatzin-7/23/1997
46 Kevin-- Uh-huh, looks good to me, too. The increase in their licensing fees wJanice Shell-7/23/1997
45 Earnings: biz.yahoo.com 31 cents vs estimates I found of 24 -that's good, Hoatzin-7/23/1997
44 Jim-- I thought that just finishing over 50 on Friday would be a breakout--GodJanice Shell-7/13/1997
43 I'll try to inquire, but sometimes this stuff just happens on no news whatsItsAllCyclical-7/13/1997
42 Janice, thanks for the link. I had already registered for the specific stock inDebra Orlow-7/13/1997
41 Debra-- Oh, yes. The guy being interviewed hit on quite a few, but since he iJanice Shell-7/13/1997
40 Was there mention of any other Y2K stocks in this article?Debra Orlow-7/13/1997
39 One other thing that I found was a mention in the Professional Investor Report Debra Orlow-7/13/1997
38 The guy referred to in the link in techstocks.com Amendment to my last post: Janice Shell-7/12/1997
37 What "guy" are you talking about?harrypolo-7/12/1997
36 Debra-- None at all, really. Just checked <i>Barron's</i> in Janice Shell-7/12/1997
35 I did see this also, but I don't think that you should read into it as beinDebra Orlow-7/12/1997
34 Debra-- There is, this, though, from several days ago: pcquote.newsalert.com Janice Shell-7/12/1997
33 Debra-- Thanks for the news story. What a weird combination of sports and tecJanice Shell-7/12/1997
32 FWIW, I expect the last move from 52 to 54 was due to shorts covering. Most of Debra Orlow-7/11/1997
31 Debra-- I got into CPWR earlier in the week, and needless to say I'm pleasJanice Shell-7/11/1997
30 Hi. No clue as to what is going on. The only thing I can figure is that the funDebra Orlow-7/11/1997
29 Helloooo???? No interest in the thread or the stock anymore? No comment on thJanice Shell-7/11/1997
28 I agree it's time for caution, but with a market cap of 2 Billion this 6.5 ItsAllCyclical-6/13/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):