SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Trading For A Living
An SI Board Since May 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1729 82 0
Emcee:  R Stevens Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
529 Colin, check out elitetrader.com. Baron Robertson has a great advanced tutoriaLen-6/25/1998
528 <i>They are often on the inside quote but MY trades <b>come throughLen-6/25/1998
527 You need this new book that just came out: "Idiots Guide To Day Trading&qjawd-6/25/1998
526 Len or anybody: . I posted the following: <i>I see my limit come into theColin Cody-6/25/1998
525 Len, [background - while I've used Level II on and off for 15 years, I am Colin Cody-6/25/1998
524 <i>Mr. DUH, with his attitude ... should get out of the Market until hejawd-6/25/1998
523 Zurdo, I'm not familiar with the SEC process for investigating these thinjawd-6/25/1998
522 jawd, I am new on this thread, and I find your comments interesting...I believezurdo-6/25/1998
521 <i>Len, My point exactly. Mr. DUH, with his attitude deserves what he geLen-6/25/1998
520 Len, My point exactly i.e. "only if applicable". Mr. DUH, with his aColin Cody-6/24/1998
519 Wew!! Thanks for the warning! It was avoided:)Daniel Miller-6/24/1998
518 Geez, Eric, <b>I</b> could have done that, but I chose not to. FirsLen-6/24/1998
517 Colin, that quote is listed as applicable if a certain code is next to your traLen-6/24/1998
516 LONG POST WARNING! Hit "Next" to avoid... Well... For the rest of Eric P-6/24/1998
515 <i>I really doubt you quoted that correctly. If that's on THE BACK ofjawd-6/24/1998
514 <i> Carefully read the back of your Datek confirmations. "We acted aColin Cody-6/24/1998
513 Bravo! You got it! "Datek Online" (the web service) is probably a sepjawd-6/24/1998
512 R. Stevens: Perhaps I'm being paranoid here, but... I noticed that they sEric P-6/24/1998
511 Come on, I've sent about ten now just from that comment. Anyone else, go toLen-6/24/1998
510 Hey, me, too on the Datek article. PM will work for me, also ThanksCharleyMike-6/24/1998
509 It's on the way thru cyberspace... Enjoy Len Len-6/24/1998
508 Do you guys have a url for that article, or could one of you private message/emR Stevens-6/24/1998
507 Yeah, I think I e-mailed it to about 30 people. But you better leave the heavyLen-6/24/1998
506 Hi Len, How ya doin! Did you see that article in New York Times about Datek? jawd-6/24/1998
505 TO ALL: There was very long and heated discussion on this subject on the DatekLen-6/24/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):