SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2484 45 0 LUMM
Emcee:  Currency Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
534 you are nuts! How would price double if no one sold. No one would be able to buRuby-7/9/1999
533 lumm will be a winner. That's one thing I am sure of. IF price lowers to ber g potgieser-7/9/1999
532 <<committed to their stock>> Some people are committed to their stDon Johnstone-7/9/1999
531 You rarely see a group of people so committed to their stock. Good luck. I am hRuby-7/9/1999
530 Mr. Dennison, very well said and thank you. Ruby, I really think you are in waYankee Trader-7/9/1999
529 Has to fall to make certain bands of nomads who roam to boards which have seen David S. Dennison-7/9/1999
528 The price is trading on hope for the future and is not out of line of many, manTed M-7/8/1999
527 <<the stock price has to fall>> That sounds like a shorter's dDon Johnstone-7/8/1999
526 Man are you ever hot with a stock you want to go up. You can't tolerate anyRuby-7/8/1999
525 Well, there goes the neighborhood, in moves ruby (in the red) hahah It's aRealTime-7/8/1999
524 Walked down 20% on 2000 volume, now is still down 20% on 15k volume...go figureDavid S. Dennison-7/8/1999
523 not all are headed down. you will see 1.50 by next week. Ruby-7/8/1999
522 Yankee, you are correct all BB stocks show 0 trades , even on real time. Regartopstock-7/8/1999
521 except for every 10 hopefuls, maybe only 1 will make it.Ruby-7/8/1999
520 FWIW I'm not selling if its @ $0.05 or $5.00. I'm in for the long haul Don Johnstone-7/8/1999
519 To All, My broker has just talked to someone at Pershing and it seems that allYankee Trader-7/8/1999
518 Or you could have gotten in at $1 and ride it for 2 years, and pay a lower capiDavid S. Dennison-7/8/1999
517 I am telling you the stock has to move down to the 1.50 range. At 65 cents, I mRuby-7/8/1999
516 Teecomm. Ruby-7/8/1999
515 Sour Grapes. Well LUMM's bid is 2 1/16th so you should be able to get in sDavid S. Dennison-7/8/1999
514 Hey Ruby, You never did answer my question....What does TCOM stand for? YT Yankee Trader-7/8/1999
513 maybe everyone wants to sell at the same time and no buyers Ruby-7/8/1999
512 Does anyone know why LUMM is not trading today? SL is not able to shed any ligYankee Trader-7/8/1999
511 I must say in deference to your point of view that I certainly hope that LUMM dDon Johnstone-7/8/1999
510 I know you didn't ask me but there really is no reason to explain the priceTed M-7/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):