SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS)
An SI Board Since October 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
55532 60 0
Emcee:  Riley G Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
53782 Riley, I listened to you say this to many times before. Maybe that's why IH Peterson-3/5/1999
53781 I am not held liable for anyone buying of selling any security. I only control Riley G-3/5/1999
53780 >>>The information that the nays had obtained be illegal means..<&lTopCat-3/5/1999
53779 If people still have unanswered questions it's not a "dead horse"Jeffrey S. Mitchell-3/5/1999
53778 Amen! These cretins are just here to try and bait shareholders into more pissiRiley G-3/5/1999
53777 Cavewoman, I can understand your point of view and you are right for this partTopCat-3/5/1999
53776 Everything is at issue here! The information that the nays had obtained be illRiley G-3/5/1999
53775 Riley needs to quit beating the dead horse too. It's dead...let it be. Cavewoman-3/5/1999
53774 <i>The Hialeah plant was closed. There were no contracts with suppliers, Riley G-3/5/1999
53773 This is all so pointless. Like beating a dead horse. Just let the horse be deCavewoman-3/5/1999
53772 Blast from the past.. when Riley knew everything.... For those who may be intes martin-3/5/1999
53771 >>>(TA sheets, shareholder lists from the TA, and copies of private faTopCat-3/5/1999
53770 <b>Why don't you take a stab at these questions you ignored the last s martin-3/5/1999
53769 The evidence MAY have been there, but it was not of the PUBLIC nature, and therRiley G-3/5/1999
53768 >> the point that I believe that is trying to be made is that the ins martin-3/5/1999
53767 Riley, if I may add to Mr.(?) Martin's comments, the point that I believe tKenny Low-3/5/1999
53766 >>And yes I read the Equities article in which Gary Morgan claimed that hs martin-3/5/1999
53765 Of course the 2 million S8 shares were well known. There was an SEC filing abouRiley G-3/5/1999
53764 The Reg S shares and the 2,000,000 shares Morgan and Breton were paying themsels martin-3/5/1999
53763 Hey Ellen, we must have a GREAT stock with TSIG Riley say's it's a SCAMY OPINION-3/5/1999
53762 Look at the volume on some of the days prior to November 4th, 1996. you will seRiley G-3/5/1999
53761 Riley that table is interesting but what it tells me is that the stock was fallJoe Master-3/5/1999
53760 Tell the SEC,FBI and anyone else to get ahold of me! IMO you are a phoney! MY OPINION-3/4/1999
53759 You have to be kidding! MY OPINION-3/4/1999
53758 OLPV Stock quotes (history) psicop.com Riley G RMIL Stock Activist psicop.comRiley G-3/4/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):