Violence against women | Political Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
Violence against women

An SI Board Since December 2002

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
79	4	0

Emcee: AmericanVoter	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
54	Okay, we went to Yemen back here #reply-18348176 . Let's now look at a bigge	Bill Ulrich	-	12/18/2002
53	And just how am I supposed to comment on an unknown, unsourced, untitled 60 Minu	Bill Ulrich	-	12/18/2002
52	Economics isn't the root cause of misogyny. What standards do you mean? Do y	Bill Ulrich	-	12/18/2002
51	Bill Ulrich, it is not the value of women that change from society to society...	AmericanVoter	-	12/18/2002
50	I haven't checked today's ForEx but it must be at least 200 goats for a	Bill Ulrich	-	12/18/2002
49	RE: trolls Keep spreading the sunlight and maybe they'll turn to stone. <	David Lawrence	-	12/18/2002
48	Let us know when you have anything to contribute (other than whining) Tom	Thomas M.	-	12/18/2002
47	It did refute for anybody who can infer from data to pops over time. You didn	Bill Ulrich	-	12/18/2002
46	<i> I presented a point of data. You said it was wrong. </i> No, I	Thomas M.	-	12/17/2002
45	Guess I picked the wrong day to give up the idea that trolls still exist on th	Bill Ulrich	-	12/17/2002
44	Tom, what's your major malfunction here? I presented a point of data. You sa	Bill Ulrich	-	12/17/2002
43	Remember "General Hospital"? Luke & Laura are the most famous and	Thomas M.	-	12/17/2002
42	All you've done is shout, "You're Wrong, You're Wrong" wit	Thomas M.	-	12/17/2002
41	Higher standard? I don't think so. Ideally, the value of woman's rights	Bill Ulrich	-	12/17/2002
40	<i>>>...a nation so advanced is held at a much higher standard than	David Lawrence	-	12/17/2002
39	Rape is NEVER acceptable... a nation so advanced is held at a much higher standa	AmericanVoter	-	12/17/2002
38	You've still provided nothing. All you've done is shout, "You'r	Bill Ulrich	-	12/17/2002
37	<i>that is your definition of "shredding"?</i> Yes. An	Thomas M.	-	12/17/2002
36	By offering nothing, that is your definition of "shredding"? It woul	Bill Ulrich	-	12/17/2002
35	I shredded your lame attempt at statistical analysis. Message 18340846 Until y	Thomas M.	-	12/17/2002
34	So apparently you're not actually going to contribute anything and instead,	Bill Ulrich	-	12/17/2002
33	<i> There's been much said about the article's dubious "	Thomas M.	-	12/17/2002
32	There's been much said about the article's dubious "facts". Yo	Bill Ulrich	-	12/17/2002
31	<i> What more do you need than his originating post?</i> Nobo	Thomas M.	-	12/17/2002
30	So, in this (nebulous) perspective you're suggesting, raping women in third	Bill Ulrich	-	12/16/2002

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):