SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
John McCain for President
An SI Board Since August 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6579 8 0
Emcee:  Ken Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5479You need to take a much longer view. Below is more along the lines of my life. IRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5478Can anyone tell me why we are unable to pacify Iraq and kill Bin Laden when we aRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5477You are younger than I thought. You sure about your facts? 1988-1990 3 brackettonto-10/30/2008
5476OK. Then if you call Obama and McCain socialist, let's go all the way. EVERYRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5475I didn't look over it. I acknowledged it. I simply don't care. McCain saRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5474correct <i>So when you condemn Obama for being the same room as Ayers on tonto-10/30/2008
5473federalbudget.comtonto-10/30/2008
5472Yes, and McCain was part of the Keating 5 scandal and associates himself with GoRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5471That's good stuff. Honest stuff. EOM Dan B.Dan B.-10/30/2008
5470Wrong. The tax cuts were projected to cost $4 trillion from 2004-1014, or $400 bRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5469you are naivelongnshort-10/30/2008
5468Since 2001, even with record low inflation, U.S. federal spending has increased tonto-10/30/2008
5467Exactly. It's on the spending side. More important than taxing the rich moDan B.-10/30/2008
5466I think you are right about McCain. The real issue is not whether Obama's poLittle Joe110/30/2008
5465Cage, looks like you bought the Republican spin, hook, line, and sinker. Think aRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5464I am not voting for slots, but for a different reason. To my mind it is ridiculoLittle Joe-10/30/2008
5463are you in MD also, O'Malley is scum. don't vote for slots it's justlongnshort-10/30/2008
5462And I would add the problem is not on the revenue side but on the spending side.Little Joe-10/30/2008
5461Amazing how you and the press overlooks all of his gaffes and emphasizes all of Little Joe-10/30/2008
5460Well I strongly disagree that what you term "condmenation by association&quLittle Joe110/30/2008
5459If we roll back Bush's tax cuts then everyone will get a tax increase(those longnshort-10/30/2008
5458"Back in 2000 America stood tall as the undisputed superpower, at peace witlongnshort-10/30/2008
5457Re: "It's only just recently gone so far in terms of cutting taxes forDan B.-10/30/2008
5456I agree with you in principle. However, I think it's a bit hypocritical to sRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5455I'm sure it is. There are smears on both sides. I wish all of them would stoRetiredNow-10/30/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):