SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
John McCain for President
An SI Board Since August 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6579 8 0
Emcee:  Ken Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5504Only in your mind. I like your alias. It's very indicative of your state of RetiredNow-10/30/2008
5503Yes. The more we move towards a tax structure that benefits the wealthy and an eRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5502Agreed!RetiredNow-10/30/2008
5501Liddy, Keating 5 and Hagee. I wouldn't go so far as to condemn God himselfRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5500LOLOL, I highly doubt anyone on SI is qualified to answer that question! <i&tonto-10/30/2008
5499I was with you until your very last statement: "are the liberals nuts"RetiredNow-10/30/2008
5498I know the longer view, I was just presenting the actual facts as compared to yotonto-10/30/2008
5497where have been?calgal-10/30/2008
5496The race is tightercalgal-10/30/2008
5495I never said a progressive tax structure was socialist. But taking money from peLittle Joe-10/30/2008
5494What people don't remember about the Laffer curve is that there was a point RetiredNow-10/30/2008
5493Not according to talk radiocalgal-10/30/2008
5492Right it is false. And all of the economists who disagree are just fools. The fLittle Joe-10/30/2008
5491I would condemn God himself for associating with that scumbag. Little joeLittle Joe-10/30/2008
5490And the question I have to ask myself is has this additional government spendingLittle Joe110/30/2008
5489That's all you have.RetiredNow-10/30/2008
5488That isn't a term anyone who knows me would ascribe to me. You on the other RetiredNow-10/30/2008
5487Sickening isn't it? More than anything, the fiscal irresponsibility in this RetiredNow-10/30/2008
5486You must not have looked at all they have recently. :)RetiredNow-10/30/2008
5485The theory that cutting taxes will spur enough economic growth to actually increRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5484Your notion that the rich have gotten some significant tax break on the backs ofDan B.-10/30/2008
5483I'm all for it, though, Obama plans to roll back only the Bush tax cuts for RetiredNow-10/30/2008
5482So if that's the case, what are you complaining about. When Obama raises taxRetiredNow-10/30/2008
5481you left out deductions, hardly anyone paid those rateslongnshort-10/30/2008
5480smear, is that all you have is smears ?longnshort-10/30/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News