SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
AFFYMETRIX (AFFX)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1728 86 0 AFFX
Emcee:  Jed Davidow Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
553 In rocky market times, people are afraid to buy companies with $1 billion capitJoseph wang-10/29/1997
552 Boyce: I agreed with your assessment. I am eager to find out the offering pricegerald tseng-10/29/1997
551 My feeling is that all the genes will be sequenced well ahead of schedule, thouBoyce Burge-10/28/1997
550 Human Genome Project status, 10/24/97. biz.yahoo.com PhilipPhilip H. Lee-10/26/1997
549 This is good news, right? Revenues up almost 100%. Earnings beat estimates byTEColeman-10/24/1997
548 Affymetrix Reports Third Qtr. Results: biz.yahoo.comCytokine1-10/24/1997
547 Earning are due Friday, any ideas what to expect?Michael Perez-10/21/1997
546 Howdy all: Has anyone out there in this thread had to opportunity to use the gAndy Patton-10/20/1997
545 Regarding dilution via public offering. While quarterly earnings are negative Joseph wang-10/19/1997
544 After some consideration, I take this development (share dilution) as a nominalPaul Weiss-10/19/1997
543 Andy, My take is fairly simple. As Alan Abelson has noted on a number of occtdinovo-10/19/1997
542 What an interesting question! I never thought of the mathematics of it that wayAndy Patton-10/19/1997
541 Curious: Does diluting the shares of a company with negative earnings make it lTEColeman-10/19/1997
540 Hi all: Just thought I should post the news release about the new offering of Andy Patton-10/19/1997
539 To all: Would like to hear what people think reg. the PR on 10/17/97 on the 1gerald tseng-10/19/1997
538 AFFX's business plan states they will be in the business of designing and mWilliam Marsh-10/7/1997
537 What I meant by my previous post was: AFFX and it's collaborators are curreMichael McVey Lusk-10/7/1997
536 Granted, there are cases such as AOL where investors will discount potential reBill Wexler-10/7/1997
535 Bill, Ever heard of AOL? >So anyone who bought today would be paying 1500 xBill Holtzman-10/7/1997
534 Huh? I'm not sure I understand your last post. Are you familiar with the Bill Wexler-10/7/1997
533 I wonder if AFFX might not be neglecting the rest of the animal kingdom, and plMichael McVey Lusk-10/7/1997
532 I agree with you. I think the technology is exciting and compelling. However Bill Wexler-10/6/1997
531 As a physician, I can tell you that this company's prospects for the futureKenneth J. Maxwell, M.D.-10/6/1997
530 So anyone who bought today would be paying 1500 x estimated FY 99 earnings. WhBill Wexler-10/6/1997
529 Bill, the following is an excerpt is from a very recent CSFB report; At a recVector1-10/6/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News