SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Pomeroy Computer Resources
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
181 4 0 PMRY
Emcee:  Wesley Jack Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
56 CHRIS; I agree with you that the stock has behaved badly over the 2 weeks howevraggs smith-5/20/1997
55 Simon and All: Our Pomeroy is acting very sick and I see no reason for this ilChristopher Brainard-5/20/1997
54 RE; Christopher " Can you characterize the investment policy of your firm&simon says-5/8/1997
53 Simon, Thanks for your observations. Can you characterize the investment policChristopher Brainard-5/8/1997
52 to all: i witnessed several large sell blocks at my institution of PMRY. Maybesimon says-5/7/1997
51 I think some were dissapointed in the 40% increase in per share without consideraggs smith-5/6/1997
50 To any and all: I have the same question-what splashed the stock today? I havmark bailey-5/6/1997
49 Raggs, Earnings came in at $0.42, $0.03 above estimates. David Pomeroy reporteChristopher Brainard-5/6/1997
48 Raggs-actually $35 to $40 sounds superb with the current price at $25 and in thmark bailey-4/20/1997
47 I think this market will be tougher than last,so Idon't se much over 35 orraggs smith-4/20/1997
46 Mark, Pearson has an investment letter in which he recommends 8 stocks a monthallen r.-4/20/1997
45 Raggs- Thanks for the reply. I looked at their 10k and annual report from ovemark bailey-4/19/1997
44 Mark;The margins for pmry have been around 3%,still low but better than1%.Shareraggs smith-4/18/1997
43 Allen- Thanks for the response. I agree with all your comments and would add mark bailey-4/18/1997
42 Mark, for whats its worth, I was also concerned about the low margins. I went allen r.-4/18/1997
41 Christopher- I live in Cincinnati and have followed PMRY to some extent for thmark bailey-4/18/1997
40 Simon and All: I almost missed the fact the company announced along with the inChristopher Brainard-4/18/1997
39 Simon, Thanks for the info, nice to know someone else thinks PMRY is a bargin aChristopher Brainard-4/10/1997
38 to all: FYI, my firm has been buying up PMRY recently. I don't know why thsimon says-4/9/1997
37 to all:I have owned pmry several times over past 3 years.This price pattern is raggs smith-4/5/1997
36 Thanks Chris for the info.simon says-3/27/1997
35 Simon, No news, just a return to a more realistic valuation. At $22 we are selChristopher Brainard-3/27/1997
34 Closed at 22 1/2 on 3/26/97. Is their any news to support this upswing or is Psimon says-3/26/1997
33 whoa, 22 3/8 was today's high. Do i see a rebound coming up after the econosimon says-3/24/1997
32 To all: hi, i'm a newbie here. I bought in on PMRY in Feb., but i didn'simon says-3/20/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):