SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA)
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7966 30 0 ACA
Emcee:  Martin Wormser Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5616 I dont think very many people know...therefore go with what you do know.....witNo BS here-7/12/1998
5615 If we are all so clean....what are we going to do about the miss information reNo BS here-7/12/1998
5614 Thats like saying why did INCO buy Diamondfields at 180...when they could havNo BS here-7/12/1998
5613 Have you ever seen D. Sh make a success out of anything other than his own pocNo BS here-7/12/1998
5612 How can you even mention PUG and ACA in the same breath.....PUG is nothing but No BS here-7/12/1998
5611 Very good point Frank....regarding previous points Alberta will be VERY VERY No BS here-7/12/1998
5610 Once you understand the agenda of some of the people of this or any other threaNo BS here-7/12/1998
5609 My response to this....if you have not taken your position now you will miss ouNo BS here-7/12/1998
5608 Other than ACA...nobody knows how to read the indicators..nobody other than TYRNo BS here-7/12/1998
5607 Thats really funny because all previous rumours have come out of Australia..SomNo BS here-7/12/1998
5606 Frank I've been following your posts for almost a year now. Thanx for the Brett Taylor-7/11/1998
5605 Frank, I know someone who knows Greg, who is a professional investor and claimsFriendly Bear-7/11/1998
5604 <<Have not gotten into the fray as of yet (ACA that is)...seems to me thYC98-7/11/1998
5603 <<In the past, a run up of the stock price prior to a NR was common placJP-7/10/1998
5602 Have not gotten into the fray as of yet (ACA that is)...seems to me that I am mgrief-7/10/1998
5601 Wish we would move away from the 52 week low. Hopefully up. Still own the origMartin Wormser-7/10/1998
5600 Looks like the internet police have arrived. George Orwell was right about bigmackenzie-7/10/1998
5599 Interesting read for all... Message 5156403 regards FrankFamularo-7/10/1998
5598 mackenzie:Results so far should have this stock at 10.Many reasons why not but ed hospi-7/10/1998
5597 Ed, I'm sorry but I don't completely agree with your ctriticisms. ACA dBWEEB-7/10/1998
5596 <<...so far they have been disappointing for the last 6-9 months>> St. Barbara-7/10/1998
5595 I must say that I was baffled at your comment saying the results have been disamackenzie-7/10/1998
5594 To YC98:What do you find disappointing about the results so far. ed hospi-7/10/1998
5593 No Polar Bears? I don't think that there are any Polar Bears in the parts oBWEEB-7/10/1998
5592 Frank:All you say is correct and since well all seem to know this the stock shoed hospi-7/10/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):