SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The California Energy Crisis - Information & Forum
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1715 22 0
Emcee:  deepenergyfella Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
565Dumb question about the Kyoto Accord..... Someone please help me with this....I Ron-6/16/2001
564Hawkmoon, you're besting him, That;s why he is going on the attack. And thisFather Terrence-6/16/2001
563Hi Sam, You've hit the nail on the head with your analysis of senior managRaymond Duray-6/16/2001
562The entire article is reprinted below. It is about time that someone looked at Sam-6/15/2001
561<I>you've made it seem like the State was planning on seizing the utilHawkmoon-6/15/2001
560Sam, Thanks for the article title, and yes, Ron Wyden is my Senator and I findRaymond Duray-6/15/2001
559Hi Hawkmoon, In the whole, I'd say your summary of the distribution systemRaymond Duray-6/15/2001
558Ray, The title to the NYT article is "Oil Data Show Industry Role in ShortaSam-6/15/2001
557re:"you've made it seem like the state was planning on seizing the utilDavesM-6/15/2001
556Ray, I haven't checked the quarterly statement of PG&E's parent, buDavesM-6/15/2001
555Hawk Watch it, you've made it seem like the State was planning on seizing tGordon A. Langston-6/15/2001
554<i>This has always been part of the master plan.</i> Ok... so what Hawkmoon-6/15/2001
553I thought they just passed a law in California that allowed you to keep weasels Gordon A. Langston-6/15/2001
552Hawk, I find a lot to agree with in your latest, but I take exception to this Raymond Duray-6/15/2001
551<i>As I've said before, A.B. 1890 seems to have been largely written iHawkmoon-6/15/2001
550Hi Sam, Re: <i>The wonders of "competition." </i> Now,Raymond Duray-6/15/2001
549Ray, Somehow no one has mentioned the NYT & ABC report that oil refiners in Sam-6/15/2001
548Hi Hawk, Re: <i>Once both parties have these contracts locked, who caresRaymond Duray-6/15/2001
547<i>OPEC calculated that about $6 of that price was due to speculators in tHawkmoon-6/15/2001
546Hi Hawk, Re: <i>And btw, the "silver bullet" for solving the cRaymond Duray-6/15/2001
545<i>I can sense the seeds of over-capacity coming into the crude market.<Hawkmoon-6/15/2001
544Hi Hawkmoon, Thanks for that exceptionally informative article by Stephen GautRaymond Duray-6/15/2001
543My apologies Ron... I didn't mean that "griping" comment personallHawkmoon-6/15/2001
542Hi GV, As always, your lucid comments on supply and demand regarding the refinRaymond Duray-6/15/2001
541No griping. Just passing along a story I thought would be of interest to this thRon-6/15/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):