SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Oxford Health Plan (OXHP)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2068 12 0 OXHP
Emcee:  Lee A. Rosin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
568 According to the S&P Report of 11.29.97..."over 650 employers offer OxWorswick-12/15/1997
567 Re: analysis If someone wants to dispute my numbers - I've asked the threaMichael Burry-12/15/1997
566 I will repeat what I have said before in other ways. As a group health actuary jeffbas-12/15/1997
565 Mike, you also might add to your list: #6 The negative effects to future revenurobt justine-12/15/1997
564 Gene, I am just presenting my analysis. I welcome views that provide substantiMichael Burry-12/14/1997
563 Mike, basically so what?? The main point in the Fortune article that OXHP mis-Gene J. Abel-12/14/1997
562 This is off topic but with all the legal talk here I thought I would ask! I rePeter-12/14/1997
561pathfinder.com Notably, the article was written before the recent additional $2Michael Burry-12/14/1997
560 Michael, Thanks for the response. Indeed, future charges weigh heavily on my Terrapin-12/14/1997
559 LPasko, Thanks for the response. I hope you didn't think that I was slingTerrapin-12/14/1997
558 Re: Smirky Steve Rod, probably very little tears were shed if Wiggins resigneThomas Haegin-12/14/1997
557 Re: Customers probably not walking Worswick, << ...people quit Oxford tThomas Haegin-12/14/1997
556 I just read the Fortune article. Although it does cast doubt on whether OxfordLPasko-12/14/1997
555 My comment was that selling at a loss for the simple reason that you find you hKashish King-12/14/1997
554 actually, refusing to TAKE manageable losses and hence letting them become hugenick cash-12/14/1997
553 I would venture to say that refusing to sell at a loss is probably the single mKashish King-12/14/1997
552 <i>As much as I want them to come through, just like you want, my trust iKashish King-12/14/1997
551 I don't know if this good news or ok news but, I went to my doctor on 12/0Prashant Patel-12/14/1997
550 Agree with you 100% Gene. Why all this anger? Perfectly good people here are Worswick-12/14/1997
549 Re: balance sheet strength Given my previous analysis, the next step is to estMichael Burry-12/14/1997
548 John, as a former class action lawyer (I now run my own business), I have been LPasko-12/14/1997
547 Gene, re: "I recommend we all start pursuing the positive OXHP which stilTerrapin-12/14/1997
546 >>>>>>>>> I would be willing to put worries about lamen mailman-12/14/1997
545 Re: Go, OXHP, go! Gene, as much as I want them to come through, just like youThomas Haegin-12/14/1997
544 Re: Management fraudulent? Gene, you write/cite << , no blantant frauThomas Haegin-12/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News