SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6710 8 0
Emcee:  Cisco Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5685<<Would you agree to a hand recount of all votes done solely under republiTraderGreg-12/10/2000
5684Ouch! Hey, I'm on your side. I think Gore's strategy of sending in a tValley Girl-12/10/2000
5683The Packers are doing better than the Redskins, that's for sure. TGTraderGreg-12/10/2000
5682Actually, CB, don't you think that abortion would become legal unless prohibThe Philosopher-12/10/2000
5681Well, this is one man's theory on Why Al Gore Battled on: The promise of parKLP-12/10/2000
5680<i>And yes I accept the USSC ruling no matter which way. I don't feel The Philosopher-12/10/2000
5679<i>Re: Roe v. Wade. I don't think even a conservative court woulThe Philosopher-12/10/2000
5678<i>If all the names were reversed, this situation would probably have playThe Philosopher-12/10/2000
5677I think, as usual, you're right, but I wasn't sure enough to say so publThe Philosopher-12/10/2000
5676And STILL you keep posting on Koresh. When will you live up to your own statemenThe Philosopher-12/10/2000
5675And here I thought you were a man of your word. Dec 9, you wrote "My last The Philosopher-12/10/2000
5674TG, <i>That is right, but in terms of relative change, we have still had Joe NYC-12/10/2000
5673The old laws may no longer be on the books. Roe v. Wade was 30 years ago, wasn&Ilaine-12/10/2000
5672So all the old laws are still on the books, just unenforceable? Sheesh. Of coursMama Bear-12/10/2000
5671CB - did you see this? Message 14989082Carolyn-12/10/2000
5670I don't think the states would have to reenact new laws. What Roe v. Wade Ilaine-12/10/2000
5669CB, as I recall there were around ten states where a doctor induced abortion wasMama Bear-12/10/2000
5668If the United States Supreme Court ruled that the manual recount should resume, Ilaine-12/10/2000
5667TG, should the Supreme Court rule in favor of Gore, I think we would all accept Carolyn-12/10/2000
5666If Roe v. Wade were reversed, that wouldn't make abortions illegal, it wouldIlaine-12/10/2000
5665That's true. The reasoning being that all experts agree that anything beyondBroken_Clock-12/10/2000
5664Geez I hate not being able to make a sure bet:) I think perhaps Monday puts aOral Roberts-12/10/2000
5663<<Want to put a candy bar on it:)?>> I only take a bet that I have TraderGreg-12/10/2000
5662Your prediction is right on the money. The stay that was issued is essentially TraderGreg-12/10/2000
5661Why can't you answer the question...don't be shy. At least Cyber had enTraderGreg-12/10/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News