SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6710 8 0
Emcee:  Cisco Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5710Maybe I should start working for the Libertarian party again. Based solely on wIlaine-12/10/2000
5709Agree with you about the sodomy laws. I don't think anyone will have the poIlaine-12/10/2000
5708You may be on top of 3 USC 15, I need new glasses to read it. -g-Ilaine-12/10/2000
5707If it's 3 usc 15, then we are on top of it<g>. For some reason, I thoTraderGreg-12/10/2000
5706I have heard that on TV, and the only thing I can think of is 3 USC 15. Maybe sIlaine-12/10/2000
5705CB--From your recollection, when we were talking about all the possible scenarioTraderGreg-12/10/2000
5704I don't see how they can overturn Roe v. Wade without overturning Griswold vIlaine-12/10/2000
5703Finally, a post from you I can agree with. There's just one problem...a strTraderGreg-12/10/2000
5702<<Kind of like sodomy laws, we still have them although usually people areCYBERKEN-12/10/2000
5701It might make a difference whether the state had abolished common law crimes or Ilaine-12/10/2000
5700<<I'm quaking in my boots.>> I suggest you obtain and don the tCYBERKEN-12/10/2000
5699Hey, I didn't say it to scare you...you were the one who said you didn'tTraderGreg-12/10/2000
5698<<the politicization of the Fla SC. But then, they've long been known TraderGreg-12/10/2000
5697<i>Hardball politics.</i> Which is a direct result of a two party sThe Philosopher-12/10/2000
5696I'm quaking in my boots.Valley Girl-12/10/2000
5695My point is that the Gore campaign ignored its public duty to concede on NovembeCYBERKEN-12/10/2000
5694<<Having said that, I don't want to listen to the Dems whine for the nTraderGreg-12/10/2000
5693I didn't say he wouldn't fight for it. I said the Fla Supreme Court wouThe Philosopher-12/10/2000
5692Having just read the article KLP posted, I am not so sure. That is truly frighteCarolyn-12/10/2000
5691If W was down less than a 1000 votes in a state that was critical for the elec vTraderGreg-12/10/2000
5690Illogical.The Philosopher-12/10/2000
5689K - scary article. I hope the Republicans are wary of her - she is no more trustCarolyn-12/10/2000
5688That's the old "Are you still beating your wife question?" I am noTraderGreg-12/10/2000
5687Thanks for your honest response. I can certainly accept that. Does that mean thTraderGreg-12/10/2000
5686True, the point of some future court overturning Roe v. Wade would be more of a TraderGreg-12/10/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News