Emulex, What Prospects? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Emulex, What Prospects?

An SI Board Since April 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
788	52	0	EMLX

Emcee: Clive Miller	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
588	Rescind all orders which occurred during the fraud. That would seem the most eq	HoyaBob	-	8/26/2000
587	There is one slight piece which is interesting: biz.yahoo.com Looks like the m	RockyBalboa	-	8/26/2000
586	MB, first many thanks for your post regarding p... 's childish accusations	RockyBalboa	-	8/26/2000
585	Peter V. IMO You have a lot to answer for. You did not respond to my previous q	Eddy Blinker	-	8/26/2000
584	Street Hawk, I don't see anyone whining here. What is wrong is the halt.	Techplayer	-	8/26/2000
583	You are one sick person. To me it looks like you need a good doctor. I do not t	RockyBalboa	-	8/26/2000
582	Hi Barb, Thanks for your reasoned explanation of the gap up to 130 at the reope	jjkirk	-	8/26/2000
581	<i>How do you account for the $7 decline today? fear and uncertainty is my	Bruce Brown	-	8/26/2000
580	Hi Troy, I know they aren't likely to reverse the trade, but Bubba Clinton	jjkirk	-	8/26/2000
579	You are piece of work... all shorters? huh?	P314159d	-	8/26/2000
578	I am not 'defending' anything. I simply asked you what you meant by your	Mama Bear	-	8/26/2000
577	It is funny how you drew that conclusion. As I never mentioned your name and he	P314159d	-	8/26/2000
576	Surfer, the stock traded between 103 and 111 for ~45 minutes before the waterfal	Mama Bear	-	8/26/2000
575	Barb, Thanks for excellent response. One clarification: <The gap up was caus	Surfer	-	8/26/2000
574	So, basically you're saying you didn't mean what the words you posted sa	Mama Bear	-	8/26/2000
573	No, Mawm just collecting for the SECs, lotta differing opinions out there	P314159d	-	8/26/2000
572	So, it's your assertion that because someone perpetrated a fraud, that every	Mama Bear	-	8/26/2000
571	Douglas, you could indeed Its late and I can elaborate more tomorrow if you li	Eddy Blinker	-	8/26/2000
570	Surfer, the halt was probably requested by the company, and is appropriate when	Mama Bear	-	8/26/2000
569	What WAS YOUR take INFO and AURICs? Man you guys hit the bigs here. hope the SE	P314159d	-	8/26/2000
568	<s for the gap up, you have an imbalance of idiotic market buy orders for tho	Surfer	-	8/26/2000
567	Hoya, Scenario #1: You hand over thousands of dollars for safekeeping to a bank	anandnvi	-	8/26/2000
566	SH, I don't disagree with all your comments, but I do take exception to this	Peter V	-	8/26/2000
565	These are stocks, not T-bills. You guys have so much faith in equities thinking	Street Hawk	-	8/26/2000
564	No. Should I? EOM	Douglas Nordgren	-	8/26/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):