Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve | Political Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve

An SI Board Since October 2000

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
6710	8	0

Emcee: Cisco	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
6010	That's funny. I think its the USSC that's missing the point here. Voter	globestocks	-	12/12/2000
6009	Don't go away mad. In fact, don't go away at all. It's really only	The Philosopher	-	12/12/2000
6008	You can't apply federal standards on "voter intent". There are s	globestocks	-	12/12/2000
6007	I think that will all come out with the US SC ruling today or tomorrow. The who	tekmon	-	12/12/2000
6006	You miss the point. It is the vagueness of the Florida statutes that make them	chomolungma	-	12/12/2000
6005	True. They demanded a recount, they got a recount. Then they wanted a hand cou	The Philosopher	-	12/12/2000
6004	Agreed, it's a marvel that there aren't any uprisings or riots. Only in	globestocks	-	12/12/2000
6003	You know the sad thing is, I think Greg is a pretty reasonable guy. I think if G	Oral Roberts	-	12/12/2000
6002	I don't see a lie there. You want to hand count some peoples' votes. Y	The Philosopher	-	12/12/2000
6001	There are no federal standards for a recount. Ask anybody with specialization i	globestocks	-	12/12/2000
6000	<i>Enjoy your President.</i> Thank you. I will. Whoever becomes P	The Philosopher	-	12/12/2000
5999	You put it better than Scalia did right there. The issue is a constitutional on	globestocks	-	12/12/2000
5998	well, actually recount law isn't a due process issue. Due process only appli	The Philosopher	-	12/12/2000
5997	Yes, but the constitutional conflict is that differing standards violates the eq	chomolungma	-	12/12/2000
5996	The appeal was filed by Bush. You are correct, the Appeal is legal. We'l	tekmon	-	12/12/2000
5995	Thanks for responding with a laugh. I'm glad my opinions amuse you- that	globestocks	-	12/12/2000
5994	<i>But that's because not everyone has gained the perspective I have.	chomolungma	-	12/12/2000
5993	Because the law saids so. Under Florida Law, if you are within a .5% of the vot	globestocks	-	12/12/2000
5992	<i>Was there anything that came out over the weekend as to why Sauls recus	ThirdEye	-	12/12/2000
5991	I posted about the problem with not hand counting. You posted that alot of votes	TraderGreg	-	12/12/2000
5990	<i>The legality of the recount is not being questioned, only the standards	chomolungma	-	12/12/2000
5989	Amen!	tekmon	-	12/12/2000
5988	Greg- Thanks for the advice. I'm aware of my opinions and the fact that ot	globestocks	-	12/12/2000
5987	Don't mind TraderGreg. He lost it a bit ago. His posts the past hour haven	The Philosopher	-	12/12/2000
5986	You're assuming too many conclusions first, as did Scalia. The appeal proce	globestocks	-	12/12/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):