SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IMOT, the Yahoo of China??
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
781 12 0 IMOT
Emcee:  kathyh Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
606 Bruce, that was precisely my point. The quote you posted was somebody else quotMr. Forthright-3/19/1999
605 <<"My point has been that the insiders can make a lot more money byBruce Prescott-3/19/1999
604 I immediately told all I was trying to short all of IMOT I possibly could. ThaRetired41-3/19/1999
603 thanks for the tip, I'll check it out. Retired41-3/19/1999
602 <<But this is a tough one to figure, it seems to me. The looming potentiaMr. Forthright-3/19/1999
601 <<My point has been that the insiders can make a lot more money by pursuijohnlag-3/19/1999
600 Sold most of my IMOT..now into buying MMCI..this little baby EXPLODED YERSTERDABouf-3/19/1999
599 To all---some evidence of IMOT presence and activity in China follows. I cannoElllk-3/19/1999
598 <<Hey if you don't have the experience to understand, fine. Go ahead Grainne-3/18/1999
597 jlg I appreciate your very articulate response and would never have guessed yoElllk-3/18/1999
596 Christine, yes I read the posts and they are quite tiresome. Emotion and no faRetired41-3/18/1999
595 IMOT is almost a certain double Friday, because I sold today:} Closed too closmarvin smith-3/18/1999
594 Christine: You are too good to be responding to some of these boys. Save youJamon-3/18/1999
593 Jaknik, sorry to hurt your feelings with the post about bench pressing, but youjohnlag-3/18/1999
592 TO THE IMOT MESSAGE BOARD: Rather than trade cheap shots with retired41 and joJaknik2-3/18/1999
591 Larry - Would you consider the standard for any internet based company to be ajohnlag-3/18/1999
590 jlg Re: <<This company has made great efforts to stay away from being rElllk-3/18/1999
589 Gotcha... She's trying to break the 5 resistance... :) johnlag-3/18/1999
588 John, I don't really disagree with most of your points. It is not critical Grainne-3/18/1999
587 I'll agree with you that there is huge growth that will occur in China overjohnlag-3/18/1999
586 Do you actually read posts directed to you, or are you so ideologically biased Grainne-3/18/1999
585 Good post Christine. Regards, t. VisionsOfSugarplums-3/18/1999
584 KG4 I agree with you nearly 100%. But have you considered that a short positioRetired41-3/18/1999
583 IMOT has no verifiable merit. The discoverable facts indicate that. The politRetired41-3/18/1999
582 <<aknik, buy you sure get nasty when told the truth.>> I think theGrainne-3/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News