SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
KEMET Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
906 12 0 KEME
Emcee:  techtonicbull Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
606Maybe 10% of tantalums just MIGHT be replaceable by ceramics, but it'd be a Ron Harvey-9/1/2000
605Houston, I fully agree. If Kemet even bought 100,000 shares that'd surpriRon Harvey-9/1/2000
604T-Bull, McGuire said the faster IC circuits need tantalum capacitors. Message 13Jack Hartmann-8/31/2000
603Jack: Have you seen links that tantalum vs. ceramic is required by some applicattechtonicbull-8/31/2000
602I once read an article that there are no substitutes in most applications for tatechtonicbull-8/31/2000
601Thanks Thomas. I saw the huge volume spike and the gap up but didn't see theJack Hartmann-8/31/2000
60098,000 block at $30.00 at 10:16Thomas C. Hyneman, III-8/31/2000
599This link explains the drop in KEM VS. AVX and VSH today.http://yahoo.cnet.com/ntechtonicbull-8/31/2000
598Of course they bought stock. They wouldn't make a PR move like that, it'techtonicbull-8/31/2000
597They have plenty because what really drives the stock is earnings and this compatechtonicbull-8/31/2000
596I would have to see time & Sales figures Jack, However, it wouldn't surptechtonicbull-8/31/2000
595Remember the quote? When KEM was "ridiculously" cheap, now it's jSJS-8/31/2000
594I would be surprised if KEM has bought substantial quantities of its stock in thWTMHouston-8/31/2000
593Tech, They have been doing it. What do you think's been causing the 13 daySJS-8/31/2000
592Did some buy 100K at around 10:20? Jack eomJack Hartmann-8/31/2000
591KEM should do their buy back todaytechtonicbull-8/31/2000
590Cash with hand in cash at KEM. biz.yahoo.comtechtonicbull-8/30/2000
589I have expected that there will be some profit taking after thirteen days of thetechtonicbull-8/30/2000
588I found this from Morningstar: <i>I've received a few queries about KCzechsinthemail-8/30/2000
587Yes, good, but not as good as SSTI! Long KEM too. bought VITR today - great chadrsvelte-8/29/2000
586"Hello?" "Hello?" {Scratchy phone connection, must be bad cSJS-8/29/2000
585Up for thirteenth day in a row. It's still way undervalued.techtonicbull-8/29/2000
584I am in at 24 and 26, but i am sticking with KEMojai57-8/28/2000
583The record stands at 57 consecutive! By Joe DiMaggio, that is hits not days up.techtonicbull-8/28/2000
582Tom wrote: "$4.00 X 15 (PE) = $60.00." Precisely. Now all analysts thtechtonicbull-8/28/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News