Martha Stewart's Omni (MSO) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Martha Stewart's Omni (MSO)

An SI Board Since August 2002

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
136	14	0	MSO

Emcee: Elmer	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
61	I saw some attorneys on MSNBC last night saying that if she had taken her 5th Am	james-rockford	-	6/5/2003
60	The indictment made worse errors than she did, IMO. Counting her shares wrong as	Sr K	-	6/5/2003
59	Not too impressed with the Governments charges against Martha. To me the big one	james-rockford	-	6/4/2003
58	Well, I guess indictment day will be tomorrow or Thursday morning. Will make for	james-rockford	-	6/3/2003
57	She is to be indicted today on the charge of "false statements." I tho	Elmer	-	6/3/2003
56	<If the US Attorney charges her with a crime, he better make it stick or his	Elmer	-	4/11/2003
55	This press release keeps showing up but by different news agencies. marketwatch	Elmer	-	2/7/2003
54	Smart!? Hey, Waksal was sleeping with Martha and her Daughter. Cool!! Waksal is	james-rockford	-	2/6/2003
53	Wow, you're right, 59% of the float is short (per YHOO, 1/8/03)! This will g	james-rockford	-	2/6/2003
52	The problem is that most of the float is short. The stock is down 20 cents on a	Elmer	-	2/6/2003
51	I wonder if they will do one of those high profile 'handcuff' walkouts w	james-rockford	-	2/6/2003
50	With this kind of news, you would think the stock would sell-off more than 4%. E	Elmer	-	2/6/2003
49	I think you are right. It doesn't seem the Feds have a criminal case.	Elmer	-	2/4/2003
48	good facts; time may tell what happened. The problem i can't get over is th	hugh thorne	-	2/4/2003
47	If Waksal were smart, he would have sold some IMCL before the FDA decision, just	Sr K	-	2/3/2003
46	i think she is guilty given the timing of the disposition. The stop loss doesn&#	hugh thorne	-	2/3/2003
45	Associated Press Feds Turn Up Heat in Martha Stewart Case Saturday February 1, 5	hugh thorne	-	2/3/2003
44	That has been my "complaint" about this whole Martha affair. Why woul	nasdaqian	-	2/3/2003
43	i saw a quick sub-title on CNN where i think Martha was complaining that the dol	hugh thorne	-	1/27/2003
42	Martha needs to have civil charges filed by the SEC which will signal that no cr	Elmer	-	1/27/2003
41	He submitted his resignation effective when his replacement is approved.	Sr K	-	1/27/2003
40	I was surprised to see Harvey Pitt on the news this week apparently still runnin	Charles Tutt	-	1/24/2003
39	<Paranoid Rant> I bought some shares on the decline that occurred two days	Elmer	-	1/24/2003
38	One other thing about a settlement with the SEC. It will take an approval by the	Elmer	-	1/6/2003
37	I've wondered the same thing. My guess is she is cutting a deal. That is the	Elmer	-	1/5/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):