SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Siebel Systems (SEBL) - strong buy?
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6974 178 0 SEBL
Emcee:  Nick Tingle Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6124Coke is going to show options as an expense going forward (starting in Q4). The David Howe-7/15/2002
6123Thanks, Mike. It wasn't the reason I did it, but it's a helluva good Uncle Frank-7/14/2002
6122<i>I get a little concerned when we start referring to CEO's by their Mike Buckley-7/14/2002
6121I'm taking a break from g&k right now, Lizzie. Haven't liked the diUncle Frank-7/14/2002
6120Hey do you guys on the G&K thread have some new kind of valuation metrics ovLizzie Tudor-7/14/2002
6119<i> I expect sebl to meet expectations. Lizzie. Imo, Tom would have warnedDr. Id-7/14/2002
6118I expect sebl to meet expectations. Lizzie. Imo, Tom would have warned if that Uncle Frank-7/14/2002
6117what are your revenue expectations for SEBL this quarter? Goldman had sebl reLizzie Tudor-7/14/2002
6116My prediction came true: Message 17545333 HankMcNabb Brothers-7/13/2002
6115donny, i wonder if SEBL has similar exposure to WCOM or others? siliconinvestor.ynot-7/11/2002
6114ha,thanks you made my day!John Carragher-7/10/2002
6113UF, thanks for the prompt response regards, ynot :)ynot-7/10/2002
6112Sorry, YN, but my vision in the software arena is limited to sebl. Dammit :-).Uncle Frank-7/10/2002
6111UF, can you suggest a list source for public software companies, ideally those wynot-7/10/2002
6110I've tried it, but have never been able to resist "peeking".Uncle Frank-7/10/2002
6109at least we still have the ignore button.John Carragher-7/10/2002
6108Yeah, I turned down the chance to get it moderated when they first instituted thUncle Frank-7/9/2002
6107Is G&K unmoderated? Start a moderated one, that is a well known thread. NoLizzie Tudor-7/9/2002
6106So has my G&K thread, or what's left of it.Uncle Frank-7/9/2002
6105thanks UF! Unfortunately the rear-view crowd has moved to the new economy threaLizzie Tudor-7/9/2002
6104Folks, those of you who wish to discuss long term investing in Siebel without exUncle Frank-7/9/2002
6103That article is more than a year old and is completely irrelevant at this time. David Howe-7/1/2002
6102Frankly, you may be confused, imho tom hasn't caused SEBL to soar, and he iynot-6/30/2002
6101The "Franky" appellation is clearly an attempt to taunt. I've not alanrs-6/28/2002
6100Andrew, <i>How does this endeavor differ from what BEAS and IBM are doingMike Buckley-6/28/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):