The truth about SI and IHUB | Stock Discussion Forums

discover

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
The truth about SI and IHUB

An SI Board Since June 2003

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
124	34	0

Emcee: mmmary	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
62	"Let's see if I can anticipate your answer" I wouldn't hold m	bob	-	6/2/2003
61	"The SEC probably just didn't want to go after an underage person."	justaninvestor	-	6/2/2003
60	you should really make an attempt at not being so obtuse. you stated that matt	Jorj X Mckie	-	6/2/2003
59	How do you know? Please post documents which show that bob and matt bought/obtai	mmmary	1	6/2/2003
58	Hey , clam up!	peter michaelson	-	6/2/2003
57	<!-- why not, I have myself on ignore too --> All this ignore business re	Quahog	-	6/2/2003
56	<i>legitimate critic </i> LOL!!! You long ago proved that you have	Jorj X Mckie	1	6/2/2003
55	I did, Glenn I posted about it here even. If anyone has any more info., send it	mmmary	1	6/2/2003
54	I was sued and won you're not listening here. I only post the truth. Anyone	mmmary	1	6/2/2003
53	Those are some very ugly statistics. I would have preferred to not bother think	peter michaelson	-	6/2/2003
52	As far as I'm concerned, I posted the truth. The fact that nobody has sued y	David Lawrence	-	6/2/2003
51	I was once sued for libel and won You should take a look around. A scammy compa	mmmary	1	6/2/2003
50	<i>The SEC probably just didn't want to go after an underage person. N	Glenn Petersen	-	6/2/2003
49	Libel is lying, I have not lied You have just libeled me by lying. If I say tha	mmmary	1	6/2/2003
48	your ignorance of the law, both civil and criminal is going to be your undoing.	Jorj X Mckie	1	6/2/2003
47	That might also account for some news I read this weekend stating that the U.S.	Quahog	-	6/2/2003
46	No one who runs a web-site can be (or should be) forced to continually publish l	Michelino	1	6/2/2003
45	Okay. Suit yourself. mmmary committed libel.	David Lawrence	-	6/2/2003
44	I said he commited fraud, didn't say he was convicted read my posts before	mmmary	1	6/2/2003
43	You can commit securities fraud and the SEC is just too busy to go after you. Lo	mmmary	1	6/2/2003
42	<i>I'm kind of surprised that Russia's population is only 141 mill	peter michaelson	-	6/2/2003
41	your argument for ignoring her has some merit. Especially when one is bookmarked	Jorj X Mckie	1	6/2/2003
40	The trick is to have discussions that shed light instead of just generating heat	Dale Baker	1	6/2/2003
39	I am not insisting that mmmary is correct in all her statements. I am simply ha	peter michaelson	-	6/2/2003
38	a whistle blower who is indiscriminate in the whistle blowing and who lacks the	Jorj X Mckie	1	6/2/2003
37	I am in favor of fundamental issues being raised and discussed. People say a lo	peter michaelson	-	6/2/2003
36	Well said.	David Lawrence	1	6/2/2003
35	In other words, you are all in favor of energetic liars who defend criminals and	Dale Baker	1	6/2/2003
34	Mary performs the very important role of whistle-blower/corporate gadfly. I am	peter michaelson	-	6/2/2003
33	Securities fraud is a legal term, and a crime. Back it up. Cite the conviction.	David Lawrence	1	6/2/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Copyright/IP Policy

Advertise on SI

© 2026 Knight Sac Media. Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News