SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Check Point Software (CHKP)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7150 103 0 CHKP
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6200MS to force IT-security censorship theregister.co.ukP.M.Freedman-11/3/2001
6199Right. You make a great point. Thanks.c. carlson-10/30/2001
6198Your bully tactics is not information. And I rarely believe anything that you ptcd-10/30/2001
6197You don't put me on ignore because you get more information listening to mec. carlson-10/29/2001
6196I love to grovel but not when it's a complete waste of time. For instance, tcd-10/29/2001
6195TCD ---------------------------------------------------------- My point is thatc. carlson-10/28/2001
6194Today's action showed how a psychological trading gap could be played. Too mP.M.Freedman-10/25/2001
6193so what's your point carlson? you haven't changed a bit. always trying tcd-10/25/2001
6192A myopic chart deserves analysis, you believe it only deserves cheer leading. c. carlson-10/24/2001
6191why don't we just rename this the c. carlson thread since you seem to know tcd-10/24/2001
6190Cyber-jihad from BBC: Hacktivists take sides in war GForce is onekhacha-10/23/2001
6189<OT> Bruce, I did stick to my stop. But the stock fell further, and thanchojiro-10/23/2001
6188Bruce, you are correct-- I mistakenly wrote earnings rather than revenues (twicc. carlson-10/22/2001
6187Someone is asking if CHKP is going to buy Guantlet firewall business from NETA. P.M.Freedman-10/22/2001
6186<i>Hi Bruce. thanks for picking the nits. saved me some time. I decided toBruce Brown-10/22/2001
6185c.carlson--You are right that I was the one who said net security would immune tP.M.Freedman-10/22/2001
6184Hi Bruce. thanks for picking the nits. saved me some time. I decided to go lochojiro-10/22/2001
6183<i>Just remember CHKP will need Q4 earnings of ~$148 Mil to meet the 30% 2Bruce Brown-10/22/2001
6182I grow tired of your banal and rude conservation. You are now on ignore. WiedeAnalog Kid-10/22/2001
6181CHKP's price now reflects the assumption of no growth in the forseeble futurkhacha-10/21/2001
6180If you think these "SI" posts have any effect on the performance of CHc. carlson-10/21/2001
6179CC, you and the others were right, what else can one say, we've been able toShort A. Few-10/21/2001
6178Well 6 months ago you were spouting that the security sector was immune to the sc. carlson-10/21/2001
6177Is CHKP slowing down? Yes, it is. Why? Because everyone does, so does CHKP. Is CP.M.Freedman-10/20/2001
6176Actually, lately CHKP has been very close to the 20 PE you mention. Perhaps the c. carlson-10/20/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):