SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
All About Sun Microsystems
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
64865 326 0 JAVA
Emcee:  Carmine Cammarosano Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
63565If energy prices rise, it's easier to justify replacing power-hungry equipmeCharles Tutt-12/17/2005
63564LOL! I'm glad to hear it. JMHO. Charles Tutt (SM)Charles Tutt-12/17/2005
63563Bring me up to speed on OPEC cutting production and its affect on Sun. Another sdpjf-12/17/2005
6356210 here we come!Mark A. Forte-12/17/2005
63561computerworld.com Charles Tutt (SM)Charles Tutt-12/16/2005
63560Hi A, I'm not so certain about uncertainty. :-) TVOldAIMGuy-12/14/2005
63559They can get support revenue only if some of their own compelling products are pQwikSand-12/14/2005
63558This negates the Uncertainty Principle of Heisenberg!!amoezzi-12/14/2005
63557I thought so, too. And there are enough VL followers that their ratings can becCharles Tutt-12/14/2005
63556Charles I used to use Value Line and Trendline and do my own hand charts. AndMJ-12/14/2005
63555I'm not a technician, but FWIW I was at the library yesterday and had a lookCharles Tutt-12/14/2005
63554Qwik, The T1 is nice and is a winner because it provide you with more power, usalydar-12/14/2005
63553This story looked interesting. forbes.com BTW I think Waterhouse has a $4 limitMark A. Forte-12/14/2005
63552Hi Charles, Re: Accumulation/Distribution of SUNW............ I don't use AOldAIMGuy-12/14/2005
63551My reply is What Charles Said. But of course wordier. Including caveats about exQwikSand-12/14/2005
63550Any time you can pay for a new system with the amount of money it will save you Charles Tutt-12/14/2005
63549Nor have I. JMHO. Charles Tutt (SM)Charles Tutt-12/14/2005
63548FWIW, Schwab allows margin on stocks below $5. I suspect such restrictions are Charles Tutt-12/14/2005
63547I think you've posted that plot before. FWIW, the last time you did, I lookCharles Tutt-12/14/2005
63546As I have only a scant understanding of these higher forms of technology, why dosdpjf-12/13/2005
63545Well, somebody believes it, stocks been moving up pretty steadily lately and nicJDN-12/13/2005
63544It's probably the worst jinx in the world for me to say it publicly, but theQwikSand-12/13/2005
63543Agree rarely. What has happened over time is that these companies, SUNW, beingMJ-12/13/2005
63542I've never seen a reverse split work out well for the shareholders. jdnJDN-12/13/2005
63541A lot of firms won't margin a stock lower than $5. It does make sense for a Mark A. Forte-12/13/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News