SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
MANIPULATION IS RAMPANT --- Can We Stop It?
An SI Board Since May 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
589 35 0
Emcee:  Dave Gore Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
64I don't have time to read through this whole thread so my apologies if this KM-5/11/2002
63<i>This thread is an embarrassment to SI, eh?</i> So <b>SmartHoatzin-5/11/2002
62manipulation doesn't exist, and anyone who thinks so... ... as in manipulatid:oug-5/11/2002
61From whence the expectation that access to any market, let alone financial markeLPS5-5/10/2002
60hmmmm, ahhaha seems to be leading the assault i anticipated when i warned dave: id-5/10/2002
59<i>You won't find one.</i> I would humbly disagree. I did notDon Pueblo-5/10/2002
58I like Art. Years ago I didn't care much for his presentation, but he got ofahhaha-5/10/2002
57I was trying to say that I believe that Art Cashin's agenda -- like a few otscaram(o)uche-5/10/2002
56Well then, why not show me how CNBC is used to take money away from people.ahhaha-5/10/2002
55Yeah, it's a serious breach of ethics, picking stocks that go up, putting thscaram(o)uche-5/10/2002
54what is the point of your thread? is manipulation a surprise to you? oh thats rilee0-5/10/2002
53<i>I'm NOT suggesting that we take action to protect innocents. I'ahhaha-5/10/2002
52<i>In Release No. 34-40900, the Securities Exchange Commission published tahhaha-5/10/2002
51This is the kind of sh&t that the SEC should be monitoring and disallow: finProphet-5/10/2002
50TO ALL: Id's comments about "manipulation defenders" coming to thDave Gore-5/10/2002
49<I>And why so defensive? This is a discussion, not a trial. </i> WhAhda-5/10/2002
48Ahhaha, Name-calling never wins points: <b>“Nasdaq market making firms<Dave Gore-5/10/2002
47<i>Check here and notice that the SEC in article 6 alone is citing 30 caseahhaha-5/10/2002
46SEC Investigation Cites 30 Market Makers For Fraud Ahhaha, earlier you made thiDave Gore-5/10/2002
45The mix of entertainment and reporting sucked innocents in during the bubble. Tscaram(o)uche-5/10/2002
44We used to blame it on the Trilateral Commission and the Kuhn-Loeb Internationalahhaha-5/10/2002
43Will respond later with updated links. <eom>Dave Gore-5/10/2002
42<i>don't you feel that some agendas are allowed a little too much inflahhaha-5/10/2002
41I am not going to get into a long discussion of this subject, but I am 100% surelucurgus-5/10/2002
40>> No naive innocents complain when markets move in their favor. << scaram(o)uche-5/10/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):