SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
KEMET Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
906 12 0 KEME
Emcee:  techtonicbull Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
656Volume is average to low and yes KEM will break through $50 slowly.techtonicbull-9/8/2000
655Lot of techs are down, but the volume is anemic! KEM is on its way to $ 50, slowRam Seetharaman-9/8/2000
654Look at what they said on CNBC today about KEM. tveyes.comtechtonicbull-9/8/2000
653KEM can keep generating those 'boring' profits, it's alright by me! The Ox-9/8/2000
652"Boring industry". Is making money boring? I don't think so. KEM itechtonicbull-9/8/2000
651Thanks for the post, Baird. Well, all we need now is for some more investors to techtonicbull-9/8/2000
650operative word "tiny capacitors" in the article makes KEM more of a letechtonicbull-9/8/2000
649[Briefing.com] BusinessWeek Mentions : Expect these three stocks to trade up thCzechsinthemail-9/8/2000
648Value line is powerful. Do you see the strength of KEM in this down trodden marktechtonicbull-9/8/2000
647Typo, in the translation most likely. I will get the actual businessweek articletechtonicbull-9/8/2000
646I saw this article. I hope that they are being conservative.techtonicbull-9/8/2000
645<i>Kemet expects the stock to hit $50 in a year, the magazine said.</i&Jack Hartmann-9/8/2000
644Valueline has no. 1 rating on it too! So stock has good upside potential well inRam Seetharaman-9/8/2000
643Thursday September 7, 11:38 pm Eastern Time Kemet succeeding in capacitor markeCzechsinthemail-9/8/2000
642Let me fix this, since I have reread it. It was NOT meant as a comment to you, SJS-9/7/2000
641Pithy, you're not.The Prophet-9/6/2000
640Steve, Send me your e-mail address so I can drop you a note. I'm at RonharvRon Harvey-9/6/2000
639Ron, Just a quick comment. There is nothing wrong with mentioning the name of SJS-9/6/2000
638In response to the e-mail request that I post my reply: 1.Of course I know who Ron Harvey-9/6/2000
637<<Thanks, Houston, for your well-developed analysis. I imagine the Emulex WTMHouston-9/6/2000
636Thanks, Houston, for your well-developed analysis. I imagine the Emulex hoaxer The Prophet-9/6/2000
635Icalled the company and spoke with Glen Spears the executive vice president. He techtonicbull-9/5/2000
634BTW, here is the number I got for KEMET in SC: 864-963-6300, which you can get bSJS-9/5/2000
633Whoa everyone! This sleepy little thread comes alive! I didn't mean to stSJS-9/5/2000
632Spare me, Tom. First the guy claims he spoke to IR and that they told him the bThe Prophet-9/4/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News