SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
ONXX
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
810 61 0 ONXX
Emcee:  (no name provided) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
660Ron, Ms. Rafferty also receives $171,640 in salary. marketguide.com To be fairMama Bear-9/24/2000
659johnsto, why in the world would I worry what a person who posts nothing but meanMama Bear-9/24/2000
658>>>Anyone with 1/2 a brain knows it's part of their pay these days Ron McKinnon-9/24/2000
657>><i>you guys really want your spin to be respected<<</i>tom pope-9/24/2000
656My position isn't significant. I think there could be some things in the pipjohnsto1-9/24/2000
655too funny...I think you guys must get to the point where you buy your own B.S. johnsto1-9/24/2000
654j1, through your posts the past 2 days, you've demonstrated your eloquence, Tom Hua-9/24/2000
653<i>Anyone with 1/2 a brain knows it's part of their pay these days<Tom Hua-9/24/2000
652really...whatever...you guys really want your spin to be respected...come on Mamjohnsto1-9/24/2000
651Sure, there won't be revenues any time soon. And everybody here knows that Charles Tutt-9/23/2000
650I believe many insiders establish "programs" in which they sell regulaCharles Tutt-9/23/2000
649<i>the truth is you have no idea what will happen with the company...</lifeisgood-9/23/2000
648I rarely hedge. What in the world gave you that idea? Some graph did not tell mMama Bear-9/23/2000
647I really find it humorous how you shorts post as though your so sure but yet youjohnsto1-9/23/2000
646<i>"100% of public companies have it...yes 100%. </i>" BRMama Bear-9/23/2000
645I read your shorts spin and it's really funny. I could really care less,but johnsto1-9/23/2000
644<i>"If they're trading on inside information they can get in a loMama Bear-9/23/2000
643If they're trading on inside information they can get in a lot of trouble, sCharles Tutt-9/23/2000
642<i>stock and/or options are part of their compensation and they treat themlifeisgood-9/23/2000
641Thank you very much for the link, Barb. As long as the funds are to be used for tom pope-9/23/2000
640It could provide a cure for some tumors. I didn't say it was necessarily a Charles Tutt-9/23/2000
639The third choice is that stock and/or options are part of their compensation andCharles Tutt-9/23/2000
638<i>Come back when a product is imminent and see what a share will cost youlifeisgood-9/23/2000
637Charles, I don't know if you followed the biotech industry in the early 90s.Tom Hua-9/23/2000
636BTW, I don't mean for anyone to infer that an SPO is necessarily a bad thingMama Bear-9/23/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News