SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
My House
An SI Board Since September 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7689 21 0
Emcee:  Original Mad Dog Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6614OK. We have no disagreement then. But the original formula- -an end to "nLazarus_Long-4/7/2003
6613LOL!!!! I hope they enjoy the solid gold fixtures. And bring some home as &quoLazarus_Long-4/7/2003
6612We had an ice storm last night. Not enough to hurt the trees in general and the Ish-4/7/2003
6611It appears that Peter is right yet again Laz. The troops seem to be bogged downOral Roberts-4/7/2003
6610<i>I'm just rather surprised Karen isn't.</i> Well, of courLane3-4/7/2003
6609<i> but hell I'm sure Peter Jennings is much more in tune to what is gLazarus_Long-4/7/2003
6608You'd be surprised how good I look in a dunce cap! :-)Lazarus_Long-4/7/2003
6607<pre> ||_ _ /\ .__|_o __|_ Rainy_Day_Woman-4/6/2003
6606snow storm advisory tonight it's getting tiresome sigh......Rainy_Day_Woman-4/6/2003
6605dunce cap for you!Rainy_Day_Woman-4/6/2003
6604Yes and don't forget all of the death squads lining up at the borders to slaOral Roberts-4/6/2003
6603losing the war, carpet bombing, protecting supply lines.....anything but winningJorj X Mckie-4/6/2003
6602I thought they were bogged down and losing the war? Well at least that is the iOral Roberts-4/6/2003
6601If you look at it logistically, the troops really don't have time enough to Jorj X Mckie-4/6/2003
6600Well, I figured YOU would be. :-) I'm just rather surprised Karen isn'Lazarus_Long-4/6/2003
6599I'm against affirmative action too.Jorj X Mckie-4/6/2003
6598Actually, I'm not against the laws. You'll have to take that up with JLazarus_Long-4/6/2003
6597<i> These laws, IMO, are like affirmative action--a necessary intrusion toLazarus_Long-4/6/2003
6596My intended point was that smoke-free restaurants are a blessing that would not Lane3-4/6/2003
6595Actually, restaurants did report a drop in business after the law was passed. ILazarus_Long-4/6/2003
6594In my area, a few years ago, smoking was banned from all buildings open to the pBicycle-4/6/2003
6593Because it never occurred to people that restaurants would ban smoking so they eLane3-4/6/2003
6592I think smokers voting with their checkbooks was well on it's way to making Oral Roberts-4/6/2003
6591If the demand is so great, why did such not exist before the passage of that lawLazarus_Long-4/6/2003
6590I would love it if they repealed the smokinginarestaurant law. I would immediatJorj X Mckie-4/6/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News