SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Iomega Thread without Iomega
An SI Board Since June 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10072 15 0 IOM
Emcee:  Jock Hutchinson Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6622 First let me say that many on this thread, especially the traders, I believe exHardMoney-1/23/1999
6621 I second that emotion. <eom> FuzzFace-1/23/1999
6620 Did you mean like the total recall of all 100 or so SciFi drives that Sony manaMichael M-1/22/1999
6619 Boy am I glad to hear from you. It looks like you are going to have to honor yoJock Hutchinson-1/22/1999
6618 >>Varo Vision to Integrate Iomega's Clik Drive Into Digital Audio PrRocky Reid-1/22/1999
6617 Does this count? <Haven't heard anything about it in the press or in PLinda Pearson-1/22/1999
6616 Lipo, It's OK. He hasn't a clue what mp3's all about. I wonder whaJeff Hayden-1/22/1999
6615 AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Linda Pearson-1/22/1999
6614 Just Thought I'd Check In Hey. I happen to catch the news release on IOM&Rocky Reid-1/22/1999
6613 Yes, Bobo, I saw your earlier post analyzing 99 sales, and heard the conferenceBob B.-1/22/1999
6612 Some random thoughts.... This stock could use a good dose of "internet hyAlan Rosen-1/22/1999
6611 The Feb'99 Max-Pain Pointâ„¢ for IOM is $7.5. The current price is $8 1/16. TBen Antanaitis-1/22/1999
6610 Darrell, in response to the answers you give, try this: fool.com ParticularlyNaggrachi-1/22/1999
6609 1. Facts are boring and uncheckable anyway 2. Personal attacks are fun and get Sosmartinov-1/22/1999
6608 I've donned my rubber suit here tonight... thought I'd post this: IomeLinda Pearson-1/22/1999
6607 Darrell - Good response to rll (whose negative posts I welcome; they're verZakrosian-1/22/1999
6606 <One interesting thing to note: Stocks usually move in the OPPOSITE directioFuzzFace-1/22/1999
6605 rll <<1. There are now fewer reasons to believe that IOM can achieve the D.J.Smyth-1/22/1999
6604 >>>Even IOM's goal is only 5% net margin and so if they have 2 BilBobo Bear-1/22/1999
6603 Mr. Mark: In paragraph two of your msg., you cite a tendency of this thread toMichael M-1/22/1999
6602 <i>The truthsayer is the enemy.....</i> Does this include your lauDavid Colvin-1/22/1999
6601 D, >>Why not mp3 on CD? Using a Clik to store mp3 files makes about as mPhilip J. Davis-1/22/1999
6600 rll, as an IOM bull, let me say I welcome your posts. No one here is truly objeFuzzFace-1/22/1999
6599 i haven't been on this thread for long, so granted, there could be some itemr.mark-1/22/1999
6598 >>>Stocks usually move in the OPPOSITE direction of the prevailing vieBBG-1/22/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):