Corporate Vision (CVIA) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
Corporate Vision (CVIA)

An SI Board Since February 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
6654	9	0	CVIA

Emcee: Robert Wu	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
6629	KAA,(or anyone else) Maybe I'm just too dumb to understand, but isn't	grw5	-	9/5/1998
6628	JC You are right about the working mechanics of these warrants, that is how t	K A Anderson	-	9/5/1998
6627	Keith, Maybe i'm reading this pr wrong because it's not very informati	JCinTC	-	9/5/1998
6626	Sorry KAA! I failed to refresh the screen, so i missed your response above. I	D LEE	-	9/5/1998
6625	K's mention of the inconvenience of warrants is very honorable. So, i agree	D LEE	-	9/5/1998
6624	I agree and like the ideas you guys are proposing much better than the warrant	K A Anderson	-	9/5/1998
6623	Tom, I agree with you. Many of us share holders are in this for the long run	opey	-	9/5/1998
6622	Well, I'm confused all over again. I thought that "strike price"	grw5	-	9/5/1998
6621	Well, if you open them up, we have a $3 ceiling until they are consumed. If yo	Tom Swift	-	9/4/1998
6620	Well Tom thats exactly why the topic is opened up, I am searching for the share	K A Anderson	-	9/4/1998
6619	Yep, we have a strike date and a strike price and a 1-year expiration. Are t	Tom Swift	-	9/4/1998
6618	Well here is the news release 6/1/98 My interpetation is they come out active.	K A Anderson	-	9/4/1998
6617	It would also allow the BOD to do anything they want, legally. If anyone does	Tom Swift	-	9/4/1998
6616	I like Tom Swift's idea. It would make the warrant issue less confusing and	Frank Henriquez	-	9/4/1998
6615	Thanks I must give thanks to those people too. As I have benefited from their	Stretch	-	9/4/1998
6614	I vote that we follow the news release exactly as written, issue the warrants,	Tom Swift	-	9/4/1998
6613	I still vote for the warrants good for more than one day. If the warrants are	Playin my Cards	-	9/4/1998
6612	My hat is off to the good discussion today. In my opinion this thread remains	D LEE	-	9/4/1998
6611	My only concern is as to the exact timing of any exercise. Are we looking at	Rich Lytle	-	9/4/1998
6610	Thank you for that MUCH NEEDED post... I cant reveal the exact mechanics of ho	K A Anderson	-	9/4/1998
6609	OFF Warrant TOPIC and ON to the CVIA Business Plan... The idea of being a hold	campe	-	9/4/1998
6608	Yeah the one day deal has its merits,,, everyone knows when the Ex date is, so	K A Anderson	-	9/4/1998
6607	So it's true then? They <b>are</b> only redeemable on that one	Michael Bendner	-	9/4/1998
6606	No the warrants are redeemable June 1, 1999... I too am leaning towards activat	K A Anderson	-	9/4/1998
6605	Well then... that solves it. We stick to Jack's PR, and those who don't	Michael Bendner	-	9/4/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):