SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6670Well, I'm not normally a grubber, but I happened to notice that one coming. The Philosopher-7/1/2003
6669me eitherone_less-7/1/2003
6668I'm not posting any more to you until we are out of these awful 666 numbers.average joe-7/1/2003
6667oh, lolone_less-7/1/2003
6666Grub.The Philosopher-7/1/2003
6665Working up to aThe Philosopher-7/1/2003
6664Actually, passion often creates power. I'm not sure I agree with you about The Philosopher-7/1/2003
6663Which reminds me. Another quote in there is 'clueless but focused.' I thTom Clarke-7/1/2003
6662It reminded me of Hepburn...and I forwarded it to my daughter's and my sisteone_less-7/1/2003
6661I suppose the last line "Life is either a daring adventure or nothing,"average joe-7/1/2003
6660You can live like that if you don't have kids. <g> Plus, you get to sTom Clarke-7/1/2003
6659High court gets it right By William Safire The U.S. Supreme Court has just slamLane3-7/1/2003
6658If passion were all it took, they would have what they want by now. What they nLane3-7/1/2003
6657I think you underestimate the passion of the true believers.The Philosopher-6/30/2003
6656<i>"No reason why a spouse should be able to inherit tax free while taverage joe-6/30/2003
6655<i>their clear agenda was to work toward full and equal marital rights witLane3-6/30/2003
6654I think I will rent African Queen this week. I have not seen it in years and itaverage joe-6/30/2003
6653<i>We are not banning the act of getting married, we are refusing to The Philosopher-6/30/2003
6652I was at the Washington State Bar Association Family Law Section annual conferenThe Philosopher-6/30/2003
6651Thank you. That was thoughtful. I heard the announcement on the radio this mornione_less-6/30/2003
6650I have a bit of a different take on the issue of homsexuals and marriage, since The Philosopher-6/30/2003
6649theage.com.auaverage joe-6/30/2003
6648Thanks. I figured it had to be something like that. The terminology is too vagueone_less-6/30/2003
6647<i>Can someone define "banning gay marriages?" </i> PreclLane3-6/30/2003
6646LOL. You raise an interesting question about the scope of privacy. As far asLane3-6/30/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):