SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Citrix Systems (CTXS)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9068 119 0 CTXS
Emcee:  Steven Tsai Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6693 FYI, www.ucsicorp.com BIG "O" dave galloway-6/22/1999
6692 Re: CTXS and Compaq <i>With the business shake-up proceeding apace, CompMikeM54321-6/22/1999
6691 Interesting post on a Compaq strategy involving CTXS. Check out the last paragStevefoder-6/21/1999
6690 I'd like to clarify something MikeM wrote, not for his benefit, but for thoMike Buckley-6/21/1999
6689 It seems to me that CTXS is situated in a good position to be the early benefacG.F.-6/21/1999
6688 Re: Sprint ION / ASP Plans Thread, Just doing some reading on Sprint's newMikeM54321-6/21/1999
6687 <i>I don't see it as a threat at all. </i> Agreed. It's aMike Buckley-6/21/1999
6686 David, I don't see it as a threat at all. Not sure why you thought this? OrMikeM54321-6/21/1999
6685 Mike and Thread, <i>Qwest and KPMG Form Application Services Provider JDavid Perfette-6/21/1999
6684 Re: Qwest and KPMG ASP Plans Thread, FWIW I've been reading a slew of artMikeM54321-6/21/1999
6683 Re: IBM News / GraphOn / Citrix Thread, Below is some news regarding IBM'sMikeM54321-6/16/1999
6682 Re: Analysts Comments ORCL/CTXS Thread, I'm sure some of you saw the interMikeM54321-6/16/1999
6681 Thanks for the detailed post. Some of the terms went over my head, so I skippG.F.-6/13/1999
6680 GF, the trigger for conversion is the price of the stock, and only the price ofChuzzlewit-6/13/1999
6679 Chuzz, Thanks for the post. Glad to know I'm not the only one with reservDavid Perfette-6/12/1999
6678 MikeM, I'll also side with Ray in agreeing with you, but for a different rMike Buckley-6/12/1999
6677 I am a bit confused by this part of your statement "which is when the intG.F.-6/11/1999
6676 Peter, I am a financial analyst, not an accountant. Analysts and accountants frChuzzlewit-6/11/1999
6675 Mike, I would tend to agree with you. I believe MSFT was the purchaser of theRedman-6/11/1999
6674 <i>"Now this would be alright, because in effect the company would hMikeM54321-6/11/1999
6673 CTC, <i>The reason is that if the price of the stock is below the converBiomaven-6/11/1999
6672 Mike you noted: <i>Secondly, what do you make of CTXS doing a convertiblChuzzlewit-6/11/1999
6671 MikeM, The calculation you do under FAS 128 to determine whether convertible Biomaven-6/11/1999
6670 <i>"The additional 6,001,000 shares should be considered part of theMikeM54321-6/11/1999
6669 Mike, from CTXS 10-Q: "On March 22, 1999, the Company sold $850 million aChuzzlewit-6/10/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):