Let's Get At The Truth | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Let's Get At The Truth

An SI Board Since February 2001

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
467	19	0

Emcee: David Smith	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
67	Clearest sign that SI is being manipulated by J-MG: -this thread: on the Hot Su	Dr. Stoxx	-	2/26/2001
66	KM, Long time no contact! Hope you are well. IMO, Jenna and Pristine are a ma	Dr. Stoxx	-	2/26/2001
65	The following is post #128 on her thread...will someone please explain to me how	David Smith	-	2/26/2001
64	Lets see how long your thread lasts in it's present form...the "why tea	parker_meridian	-	2/26/2001
63	Excellent post. You address many of the concerns that prompted me to start this	David Smith	-	2/26/2001
62	I was asked at one time during the summer/fall to participate in the MG chatroom	KM	-	2/26/2001
61	No one is "mad" at anyone. That is not the purpose of this thread. We&	David Smith	-	2/26/2001
60	Why is everyone so mad at Jenna? If you don't like her posts on SI or her w	hoffy	-	2/26/2001
59	I agree....the quick bans are an attempt to maintain some sort of control over h	David Smith	-	2/26/2001
58	It's very interesting to me how fast she is banning people from her thread.	truthcommission	-	2/26/2001
57	I do not know the number of subscribers, but I DO know that people have not rene	David Smith	-	2/26/2001
56	If what has been said here is true, I doubt that the number of paying subscriber	Constant Reader	-	2/26/2001
55	Thanks...good post. I strongly suggest that you e-mail S.I. and tell them that y	David Smith	-	2/26/2001
54	LOL - it's like Reagan and Iran-contra, either they are complicit and extrem	Dale Baker	-	2/26/2001
53	The following is the reply I received from S.I. after complaining about the blat	David Smith	-	2/26/2001
52	<i>Not sure how but venting here sure makes me feel better. </i> A	Dale Baker	-	2/26/2001
51	Hi Dave, I asked Jenna why she was pumping ARXX earlier as it is a lame stock w	pprincesss	-	2/26/2001
50	Looks like David has been on SI for more than 3 years...in contrast to their adv	Dale Baker	-	2/26/2001
49	many private e'mail.. i've received 9 private e-mails as well but I have	trader_joe	-	2/26/2001
48	I have heard accusations that perhaps they do share in the fees....I am not comm	Dale Baker	-	2/26/2001
47	I would love to see some of her subscribers post here and relate the experience	David Smith	-	2/26/2001
46	I agree.....their position (at least as defined in your post) is a joke, and in	David Smith	-	2/26/2001
45	David, I asked SI why they allow such blatant violations of their advertising po	Dale Baker	-	2/26/2001
44	That is why this tread was created, to show all the 'newbies the truth'	trader_joe	-	2/25/2001
43	Easy/tj..<oar> call"ath.. Play, w/child/z/az U may jc..<ta/ruth.	Chartgod	-	2/25/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):