SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
QLT PhotoTherapeutics (QLTI)
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1321 51 0 QLTI
Emcee:  Doug Lakin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
671 We're counting on you Yanks tomorrow! Whenever we Canucks have a day off, Jarrod W. Pakosh-10/10/1999
670 QLT PhotoTherapeutics' common shares are expected to commence trading on a George Mc Geary-10/9/1999
669 Anyone know why the Nasdaq quote does not yet reflect the stock split and if thJarrod W. Pakosh-10/9/1999
668 Another house starts QLT with a strong Buy. QLT Photother. QLTI HCFP/Brenner SIan@SI-10/8/1999
667 And a little colour on today's move... ++++++++++++ <b>QLTI ReiteraIan@SI-10/6/1999
666 a little more colour on the Nov 17th FDA subcommittee meeting... Monday OctobeIan@SI-10/4/1999
665 Big smiles on November 18th??? ++++++= October 4, 1999 <b>FDA To ReviIan@SI-10/4/1999
664 ?????? QLT PHOTOTHER (Toronto:QLT.TO) - More Info: News , Research Last TraJulian-9/30/1999
663 Ed, Webster's does not have the definition wrong. The error is in your appHarry Lewis-9/29/1999
662 I think we are talking about dilution because of this Message 11384175. I guesScripts-9/29/1999
661 Why are we even talking about dilution? If you have one ounce of pure gold worJarrod W. Pakosh-9/29/1999
660 I have no difficulty Ian. I got into QLT at C$28 and love the splits and the pScripts-9/28/1999
659 Ed, I don't think that Webster's got the definition of dilution wrong.Ian@SI-9/28/1999
658 Hi Ian The question I had was not how wealthier I might be but how the stock cScripts-9/28/1999
657 Ed, Which would make you wealthier? 1. Owning 1 share worth $100 2. Owning 2Ian@SI-9/28/1999
656 -- OT -- The book value of the stock is static. When the stock splits (or 100PDL-9/28/1999
655 I'm willing to learn. What is wrong with the following definition of dilutiScripts-9/28/1999
654 There's no dilution in a stock split. Maybe Canadian investors (and somePDL-9/28/1999
653 Could be. My understanding is that stocks usually go up in anticipation of splScripts-9/28/1999
652 ED do you think the stock split announcement has had an effect? regards zakzakaran-9/28/1999
651 Down about $8 so far. Is there news that I have missed?Scripts-9/28/1999
650 BV, Yes your questions have been answered and more on the thread. Note that tIan@SI-9/27/1999
649 Network news (NBC, I think) just did a segment on QLTI's science. Very posiBostonView-9/27/1999
648 A 2 for 1 split at this time seems perfect. Those who have supported the compaScripts-9/27/1999
647 2 for 1 split just right! 63.4 million shares is just perfect! I was hoping iJarrod W. Pakosh-9/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News