SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Clinton Survey "Resign" Yes or NO
An SI Board Since September 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
697 0 0
Emcee:  JJMM Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
672 By definition it includes other things besides lying. Your reference that perjudel clark-2/9/1999
671 Perjury is ALWAYS lying...it includes other things- but it ALWAYS includes lyinDan B.-2/9/1999
670 Look for the last time... Perjury is not lying. They are two different things. del clark-2/9/1999
669 Just tell me you think Clinton could have possibly been consciously unaware ofDan B.-2/9/1999
668 <<I have caught you in three lies do you want to make another? ToDan B.-2/9/1999
667 I have caught you in three lies do you want to make another? To: del clark (66del clark-2/9/1999
666 <<You made the statement that "lying is perjury" Now you are goDan B.-2/9/1999
665 You made the statement that "lying is perjury" Now you are going tdel clark-2/9/1999
664 I'll humor you this much. You say <<Perjury is NOT lying. Your compaDan B.-2/8/1999
663 "perjury is lying" better crack a book there, Dan. Perjury is NOT lydel clark-2/8/1999
662 I rest my case here...you have no evidence to offer nor discuss. Perjury is lyDan B.-2/8/1999
661 What pole says "70% of Americans believe he committed perjury"? Most del clark-2/8/1999
660 Senator Byrd is one man. He does not rule the party. He most likely will vote adel clark-2/8/1999
659 Guess what- 70% of Americans believe he committed Perjury. What lies? It woulDan B.-2/8/1999
658 del, re >You really believe Reagan wasn't lying when he said "I doFangorn-2/8/1999
657 You really believe Reagan wasn't lying when he said "I don't recaldel clark-2/8/1999
656 del, Reagan's alleged "secret war" did NOT break any law, even tFangorn-2/8/1999
655 Of course they had evidence. Reagan was running a secret War for Christs sakes.del clark-2/8/1999
654 Come on, get real here. What a Clinton said when 24 years old and in college hadel clark-2/8/1999
653 del, re >Stop and think a minute. The Democrats had more than enough evidenFangorn-2/8/1999
652 "The entire case is built upon innuendo and the distorted logic &quDan B.-2/8/1999
651 For one a lie is not perjury. Secondly one must prove his intent to lie. This cdel clark-2/8/1999
650 "They didn't even prove he lied under oath." Yes they did. :-)Dan B.-2/7/1999
649 I really believe since this Presidents crimes cross political lines as they do.Dan B.-2/7/1999
648 "However, I'll never understand how you can stand the stench coming frdel clark-2/7/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):