The Boxing Ring Revived | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived

An SI Board Since October 2001

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
7720	16	0

Emcee: Neocon	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
6745	I thought the the column on Justice O'Connor would resonate with you. The P	Lane3	-	7/9/2003
6744	Science historians ponder naming 'enemies' in science literature In a pe	TimF	-	7/7/2003
6743	Pretty good article. I agree with a lot of it but probably not the part about a	TimF	-	7/7/2003
6742	From the spin in this article, I assume that poll takers don't ask whether p	Lane3	-	7/7/2003
6741	I suppose it's a matter of how you view human nature. I think you hit the k	The Philosopher	-	7/4/2003
6740	I still think there's a better chance of getting intellectual and any other	Lane3	-	7/4/2003
6739	<i>they worry more about their legacies than sucking up to passive vo	The Philosopher	-	7/4/2003
6738	I don't disagree with you, I'm just think that SC judges have at least a	Lane3	-	7/4/2003
6737	Thirty years ago I might have agreed with you. But when you look at the process	The Philosopher	-	7/4/2003
6736	I have little confidence in either. I suppose, if forced to choose, I would hav	Lane3	-	7/4/2003
6735	Quote for the day: "America was born of revolt, flourished on dissent, b	The Philosopher	-	7/4/2003
6734	Hew's right, you know. The problem with the Constitution is that it doesn&#	The Philosopher	-	7/4/2003
6733	I can see both sides of the which-is-worse argument. Isn't that a sad state	Lane3	-	7/4/2003
6732	<i> Congress just offends me more and the SC just offends you more. Seems	TimF	-	7/4/2003
6731	A pretty good take on the matter. The default position is to be cautious in alte	Neocon	-	7/4/2003
6730	<i>That's why we the founding fathers gave us the Supremes, who a	The Philosopher	-	7/3/2003
6729	I just saw an editorial in today's Post that remarked about the 'tude of	Lane3	-	7/3/2003
6728	<i>the "wholesale" problem with lifting the legal and social cen	Lane3	-	7/3/2003
6727	The SC is part of "the Feds". If they can make any decision they want	TimF	-	7/3/2003
6726	<i>For another it would leave the states with no power because while the f	Lane3	-	7/3/2003
6725	<i>The contrary, it appears, would have to be their committing an act of t	Lane3	-	7/3/2003
6724	Springfield vs. Shelbyville Gay marriage, incest, and The Simpsons. nationalrev	TimF	-	7/3/2003
6723	I think the 9th amendment was intended to discourage the government from control	TimF	-	7/3/2003
6722	Acouple of interesting letters at andrewsullivan.com CONCEDING DEFEAT: You'	TimF	-	7/3/2003
6721	I look forward to your treatise on the meaning of the 9th amendment! If you can	The Philosopher	-	7/3/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):