SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6770The only thing he forgot to mention was that Bush gave this speech while standinThe Philosopher-7/10/2003
6769Zowie. You know how to hit a guy right between the eyes! I think the concept oThe Philosopher-7/10/2003
6768THOUSANDS OF SADDAMS SURRENDER $25 Million Bounty ‘Motivating Factor,’ OfficialTimF-7/10/2003
6767:-)TimF-7/10/2003
6766I'm stealing that. :-)epicure-7/10/2003
6765That was so funny that I went searching for Andy Borowitz- and found this columnRambi-7/10/2003
6764Hard to say whether Spike Lee was just hustling Viacom or whether he really is aLane3-7/10/2003
6763So, following your approach, how do you think the civil rights movement, which ILane3-7/10/2003
6762<i>If the legislature fails to protect equal justice, the court has nothinThe Philosopher-7/9/2003
6761<i> "I am pleased to be able to resolve this matter and be able to wTimF-7/9/2003
6760<i> I don't know of a single constitutional amendment that was enactedLane3-7/9/2003
6759I've been without my computer for a couple of days while it made a trip to DLane3-7/9/2003
6758<i> I don't get why you don't get that it's the SC's jThe Philosopher-7/9/2003
6757In practice most affirmative action seems to amount to preferences. Either direTimF-7/9/2003
6756<i>I would particularly see as incorrect court mandated affirmative actionLane3-7/9/2003
6755<i> if the SC is going to take on legislative and executive duties along wLane3-7/9/2003
6754I think just about any other approach would have been better, or more to the poiTimF-7/9/2003
6753<i> If your questions is where is it that we get those rights, well,The Philosopher-7/9/2003
6752<i>I don't see how racial preferences for historically disadvantaged rLane3-7/9/2003
6751Chris, I'm one of those people who have raised their right hands and sworn tLane3-7/9/2003
6750Hi, CR. It's been a long time. Good to hear from you.Lane3-7/9/2003
6749<b><i>legislatures were more thoughtful in what they did.</b>&Constant Reader-7/9/2003
6748I agree with you about O'Connor's predeliction to substitute political fThe Philosopher-7/9/2003
6747<I> Seems to me that what we call judicial activism is very much a functioTimF-7/9/2003
6746That was interesting, something that had actually occurred to me before briefly Lane3-7/9/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News