SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
The Thread II
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9026 65 0 COMPX
Emcee:  stan s. Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6776why are you guys smooching mcguire? even his wife needs a full bottle of scotch charlie mcgeehan-3/26/2002
6775Happy Talk at CNBC Its analysts are always upbeat; its anchors don't probe BAD-3/18/2002
6774Pete, what a beautiful kid! Thanks for the pic!Bo_-3/18/2002
6773My pleasure.nolimitz-3/18/2002
6772NL... Definitely a beautiful child! Thanks for sharing the pic.gypsees-3/18/2002
6771A good smooch can cure what ails ya...<GG>gypsees-3/18/2002
6770He is scary that way! VBG.nolimitz-3/18/2002
6769pete...judging from the last two posts, you have a babe magnet on your hands....Ian McGuire-3/17/2002
6768He's so CUTE! What a gorgeous smile. You'll have the phone ringing offJeanD-3/17/2002
6767what a beautiful child!:-)mph-3/16/2002
6766the big guy netnow.micron.netnolimitz-3/16/2002
6765:-)mph-3/14/2002
6764you think a "smooch" can assuage the wrongs you and your piffers have Ian McGuire-3/14/2002
6763smooch:-)mph-3/14/2002
6762hey!..i just noticed that vicious and unprovoked attack!..sheesh, nothing but abIan McGuire-3/14/2002
6761never zz, never...i always said we had the best thread wenches....i wouldnt dareIan McGuire-3/13/2002
6760I guess I could have made that #1, but it would have been way too e<b>mph&mph-3/13/2002
6759<i>5. That McGuire guy hasn't found the thread yet</i> LOL! MiMike E.-3/13/2002
6758a tad too e<b>mph</b>atic if you ask me<g> btw, Message 17195mph-3/13/2002
6757McGuire, are you messing with the ladies again ???farkarooski-3/13/2002
6756actually, i thought it a tad e<B>mph</B>atic...heheIan McGuire-3/13/2002
6755don't you think it a tad <i>ironic</i> for you to be suggesting mph-3/13/2002
6754I am NEVER guilty<g>mph-3/13/2002
6753Dear, you know that nobody is "innocent". But evidence does seem to sJorj X Mckie-3/13/2002
6752"...I'm still trying to figure out why minnow would hang out with a bunIan McGuire-3/13/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):