SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
NetCurrents NTCS
An SI Board Since September 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
8925 253 0
Emcee:  Teresa Lo Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6850<<Would this volatility be a direct response to on-line trading?>> stockman_scott-4/8/2001
6849Interesting charts... Would this volatility be a direct response to on-line traXenaLives-4/7/2001
6848<i>About a year ago I posted some charts showing the fantastic increase inMichael Watkins-4/7/2001
6847A look at NASDAQ up days and volatility: geocities.comAllansAlias-4/7/2001
6846That makes complete sense, thanx a lot!!!!Jill-4/7/2001
6845<i>I never did quite understand why you need new marginal lows for a true Michael Watkins-4/7/2001
6844Beautiful informative charts, Mike. I never did quite understand why you need nJill-4/7/2001
6843michael yeah, draw probably sums it up, and i'll add some verbage here anywmilesofstyles-4/7/2001
6842milesov, any thoughts on today? Here's mine... Reviewing the day's pricMichael Watkins-4/6/2001
6841follow-up NQ 62% retracement broke....now you see it now you don't<g>Jeff Jordan-4/6/2001
6840yesterday's futures action was very telling....a strong upward push on everyJeff Jordan-4/6/2001
6839nice chart i put a few potential higher lows up tonite, and a few at acceleratemilesofstyles-4/6/2001
6838Hi Ken, For the past few days we've been sensing the market building tensioMichael Watkins-4/6/2001
6837michael and all re: COMPX michael - thanx for the reply !!! truthfully, compken-l-4/6/2001
6836Strictly speaking, some of them are not double bottoms - they are higher lows inMichael Watkins-4/5/2001
6835Hi Tom, Now lets see if they can take on their various moving averages. Bobrobert b furman-4/5/2001
6834Look at all these double bottoms! stockcharts.com[m,a]daclyimy[dc][pb10!b50!b20Tom McIlwain-4/5/2001
6833Teresa -- You're welcome. (Sorry for not getting back sooner, was away)Andriy Turhovach-4/5/2001
6832Black bars or candles sound fine to me...would like to see ADX in it's own wPaul Viapiano-4/5/2001
6831Perhaps we might move the bars back to black bars or candles - but as we will diMichael Watkins-4/5/2001
6830auto - well so far price is moving about as expected, isn't it :) We'llMichael Watkins-4/5/2001
6829re<i>swing charts are getting confusing to view</i> Ditto Freeusfreeus-4/5/2001
6828Teresa, Seems to me that the swing charts are starting to look pretty confusingPaul Viapiano-4/5/2001
6827michael and all re: COMPX, micheal - thanx for the reply !!! re: >> So fken-l-4/5/2001
6826One thing that's certain is 2 bars before the current one is H[2]. Whether MechanicalMethod-4/4/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News