Employee Stock Options - NQSOs & ISOs | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends
Employee Stock Options - NQSOs & ISOs

An SI Board Since June 2002

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
786	22	0

Emcee: rkral	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Posted
686	Ron, <i>Among other things, the option value is based on the stock price	Don Lloyd	8/1/2004
685	Don, re "<I>You consider it an advantage that a totally arbitrary sto	rkral	8/1/2004
684	Ron, <i>But the connection to the stock price is avoided by the FASB meth	Don Lloyd	8/1/2004
683	Don, re "<I>Doesn't it make anyone the least bit nervous to claim	rkral	8/1/2004
682	Ron, Be that as it may. The one thing that supporters of option expensing have	Don Lloyd	8/1/2004
681	Don, if the authors followed their reasoning through to its logical conclusion .	rkral	8/1/2004
680	FWIW - empower.org (31 pages full version WORD file) empower.org (9 pages cond	Don Lloyd	7/31/2004
679	House Passes Curb On Expense Rules For Stock Options By MICHAEL SCHROEDER Staf	hueyone	7/21/2004
678	Who'll Be Liable for Options? By Chris Mallon, July 12, 2004 [ fool.com ]	rkral	7/12/2004
677	Are Stock Options a Big Deal to Investors? Fri	Mick Mørmøny	7/9/2004
676	BusinessWeek Online Commentary: Earth To Silicon Valley: You've Lost This Ba	hueyone	7/7/2004
675	Buffett attacks stock options bill <b>Fuzzy Math	Mick Mørmøny	7/6/2004
674	re: The anti-expensing folks sure seem to be more vocal and more organized than	hueyone	6/25/2004
673	Employees & Companies Make Their Voices Heard on the Value of Employee Stock	rkral	6/24/2004
672	Stock options battle joined. Influential U.S. senator throws weigh behind acco	Mick Mørmøny	6/21/2004
671	Accounting for Tax Consequences of Instruments Awarded to Employees [from FASB S	rkral	6/19/2004
670	Huey, re "<I>before-tax numbers are not being disclosed AFAIK. </I	rkral	6/19/2004
669	Ron, there's no question in my mind that Barrett is the leader of that propo	GVTucker	6/17/2004
668	FEELING THE HEAT ON STOCK OPTION REFORM, CHIP GIANT [ed: INTEL] STARTS ADJUSTING	rkral	6/17/2004
667	GVTucker, re "<I>"Stock based compensation" is a line item	rkral	6/17/2004
666	rkral, RE: <i>BTW, since MSFT began reporting per SFAS 123, I've not	GVTucker	6/17/2004
665	Huey, re "<I>I really don't know whether the tax treatment would	rkral	6/17/2004
664	<i>AFAIK, there is no way to reverse expenses in the instance where a comp	hueyone	6/17/2004
663	Interesting points. <i>"expense deduction at time of exercise"	hueyone	6/17/2004
662	"expense deduction at time of exercise" But NOT at time of grant. At	R2O	6/16/2004

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):