SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Complacency Indexes
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1487 37 0
Emcee:  TechTrader42 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
687This is insane! (EOM)Sherman Chen-3/8/2002
686ST Naz CI: 86.134 67.752 MT Naz CI: 87.912 71.886 LT Naz CI: 95.791 90.210 ST STechTrader42-3/8/2002
685These are the closing values today: ST Naz CI: 67.752 78.571 MT Naz CI: 71.886 TechTrader42-3/7/2002
684ST Naz CI: 66.492 78.571 MT Naz CI: 70.788 81.319 LT Naz CI: 89.828 93.495 ST STechTrader42-3/7/2002
683I share the view that it's being pushed up, before they spring the trap. YouTechTrader42-3/6/2002
682hehe .. now Brook ... I was reading your rant about TA and I thought "so wGersh Avery-3/6/2002
681Slightly condensed version: <b>Q: What does the typical trader use to anaTechTrader42-3/6/2002
680<< This borrowed bag of statistical tricks called TA >> Ran across Triffin-3/6/2002
679Yes, they could be negated. The odd thing about those Class 1 sell signals is TechTrader42-3/6/2002
678FWIW, I believe Donald Sew also got Class 1 sells on all the indexes today on a Sherman Chen-3/6/2002
677After the close: ST Naz CI: 78.571 83.298 MT Naz CI: 81.319 85.440 LT Naz CI: 9TechTrader42-3/6/2002
676They haven't maxed out today: ST Naz CI: 76.260 83.298 MT Naz CI: 79.304 85TechTrader42-3/6/2002
675ST Naz CI: 79.832 83.298 MT Naz CI: 82.418 85.440 LT Naz CI: 93.878 94.930 ST STechTrader42-3/6/2002
674Analysis of market today follows. The market was kind enough to visit this threaTechTrader42-3/6/2002
673Incidentally, note the divergence with the Naz CI's. Naz is up, CI's areTechTrader42-3/6/2002
672Hoping for 100 or nearby at market close (with S&P): ST Naz CI: 73.529 83.2TechTrader42-3/6/2002
671It's a bad habit that I can't stop, Gersh (posting the CI's, that isTechTrader42-3/6/2002
670Brookie .. you prankster .. <i>I'd lose my following (a group of daytTriffin-3/6/2002
669Well .. I'm one that has been foolish enough to watch .. Please keep postinGersh Avery-3/6/2002
668Here are the CI's. I should make it clear that there hasn't been a sell TechTrader42-3/6/2002
667A good note from Triffin (Jim) on combos/straddles: btw for the QQQ .. hereTechTrader42-3/6/2002
666ST Naz CI: 69.853 83.298 MT Naz CI: 73.718 85.440 LT Naz CI: 90.848 94.930 ST STechTrader42-3/6/2002
665Here are the CI's: ST Naz CI: 64.391 83.298 MT Naz CI: 68.956 85.440 LT NazTechTrader42-3/6/2002
664I'm surprised, Susan. I thought traders on other lists were busily drawing uTechTrader42-3/6/2002
663Brooke, The Complacency Indexes are on the front page again. I seem to remember Susan G-3/6/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News