SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Buying SPLITs and other Strategies
An SI Board Since November 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1163 35 0
Emcee:  Terry Whitman Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
688Dow World Index breaking out to new highs- stockcharts.com What's wrong witTerry Whitman-2/16/2005
687Thanks for posting that. Do you have a site listing annual historical returns oBrumar89-2/11/2005
686OK- finally got a change on the new TRIN-RSI System. It is moving to LONG. Buy Terry Whitman-2/11/2005
685your welcome :) another fun fact: basic full-year average, the market has rallivirtualsignal-2/11/2005
684Interesting. Thanks. I guess that would make this '5' (if it's up)-Terry Whitman-2/11/2005
683TRIN 4/21 system whips back to Long..Terry Whitman-2/11/2005
682S&P 500 Closed Higher by Year-End Year Year-End 1875 -3.7% 1885 +19.8% 189virtualsignal-2/11/2005
681I'm pretty sure I said <every other '5' year> would have been Terry Whitman-2/11/2005
680Let's see : 2001 was year 1 of Bush's first term. And 1997 was year 1 oNancy-2/10/2005
679TRIN 4/21 System moves to Short. Last trade +1.9%, YTD +2.2%Terry Whitman-2/10/2005
678Perhaps so. Simply tying it to the absolute rate value is probably oversimplifyiTerry Whitman-2/10/2005
677Shouldn't it be relative to inflation, as opposed to absolute levels? Core CPaul Shread-2/10/2005
676I see. That would put the average discount rate at the start of the cycle down tTerry Whitman-2/10/2005
675Terry: Those were the prime rates so would be 3 to 4 points higher than the disLogain Ablar-2/10/2005
674NEW CHART reads. Scale goes from -5 to +5: <pre> <u> SYMBOL RatiTerry Whitman-2/10/2005
673>I believe none of the previous "year in 5" was a prez year 1< Terry Whitman-2/10/2005
672I believe none of the previous "year in 5" was a prez year 1. Prez yeNancy-2/9/2005
671Thanks, Tim. That's just the data we need. Not really that many instances oTerry Whitman-2/9/2005
670Terry: Looks like they've done baby steps as well. research.stlouisfed.orgLogain Ablar-2/9/2005
669That would sure mess up the 'years ending in '5' streak'. I canTerry Whitman-2/9/2005
668Don't know if you get the Chart of the Day, but today's showed that the Paul Shread-2/9/2005
667I dont recall about the lower low part. I only remember the part about a sustaiNancy-2/8/2005
666That leaves us with the only possibility being that we to see a lower low. AccorTerry Whitman-2/8/2005
665Dont know. as that IBD article said a follow-thru does not guarantee a sustaineNancy-2/8/2005
664Not sure I would make that conclusion. The NYSE A/D line is breaking to new hiTerry Whitman-2/8/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):