SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Austrian Economics, a lens on everyday reality
An SI Board Since December 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
445 23 0
Emcee:  Don Lloyd Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
70"Gouging" was an unfortunate choice of words, although I do think therNeocon-12/14/2001
69I agree with you on 99.9% of all price gouging complaints, but if there truly isTimF-12/14/2001
68Neocon - An added thought on the plywood and the Florida hurricane - If a retaDon Lloyd112/14/2001
67I will consider that, and get back to you.....Neocon-12/14/2001
66Neocon - <...Therefore, although I agree there is a ceiling to price- gouginDon Lloyd112/14/2001
65I think the points are compatible, but not equivalent, if we make two adjustmentNeocon-12/14/2001
64Neocon - <i>...Besides, strictly speaking, it is only necessary to have tDon Lloyd-12/14/2001
63You are right, I gave a straightforward neo- classical answer. I agree that therNeocon-12/14/2001
62Neocon - <i>It drives down prices, and motivates searches for competitiveDon Lloyd-12/14/2001
61It drives down prices, and motivates searches for competitive advantages, such aNeocon-12/14/2001
60All - While I'm tied up with some reading, rather than leave the subject enDon Lloyd-12/13/2001
59< This is part of the Austrian involvement. A benefit to one party of an exchLLCF-12/12/2001
58< If you can also get the number of shares outstanding for each quarter you cLLCF-12/12/2001
57<i> ie. perhaps earnings growth rate/ share growthrate = actual earnTimF-12/12/2001
56DAK - <i>...I see no reason why you couldn't have a non-cash expense Don Lloyd-12/12/2001
55<The overriding issue is that if a dollar denominated expense for option compLLCF-12/12/2001
54DAK - The overriding issue is that if a dollar denominated expense for option cDon Lloyd-12/12/2001
53<If accounting is supposed to audit the company, and not the shareholders, thLLCF-12/12/2001
52DAK - <i>ie. isnt' Warren saying that the 'analyst' has to coDon Lloyd-12/12/2001
51<A debit here is a credit there no??> ie. isnt' Warren saying that thLLCF-12/12/2001
50I thought that was self evident.... $100 million of course... my answer went pasLLCF-12/12/2001
49eddieww - <i>According to the vons (Mises, Hayek), does a government haveDon Lloyd-12/12/2001
48eddieww - <i>...Consider the possibility that unfettered laizez-faire capDon Lloyd112/11/2001
47The problem is that there is no good reason to substitute the judgement of the gNeocon112/11/2001
46Well, you present some good and some poor reasons why my mini-cartel wouldn'eddieww-12/11/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):