SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
OAKLEY- NYSE:OO
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1383 7 0 OO
Emcee:  stockvalinvestor Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
708 Ken, seeing as how you started both of the Oakley treads, I was just wondering Dr. Jeff-7/2/1997
707 You should have stated that Jordan received an option to purchase 500,000 shareharkenman-7/2/1997
706 I wouldn't call "OAKLEY BACK IN FAVOR ON WALL ST." just yet Russ.Dr. Jeff-7/1/1997
705 OR SOLD!Dr. Jeff-7/1/1997
704 Brian, Here is the scoop. An insider must report by the 10th of the FOLLOWINGSteven Angelil-7/1/1997
703 Dear Steven, After further investigation with Edgar and the SCE Home page, itBrian C. Lund-7/1/1997
702 Dear Steven, If this is correct then I was wrong. But even so, this must be Brian C. Lund-7/1/1997
701 Earnings should be good. Estimates only .15 for qtr vs. 22 for last year. Ungiles-7/1/1997
700 Can you say "window dressing"? OO is back in favor on Wall Street anRuss Cinkle-7/1/1997
699 OO is tanking today on virtually no volume! It dropped to 13 3/8 from 13 7/8 iDr. Jeff-7/1/1997
698 Brian and all, I have to correct you re: insider data being 3 months old beforSteven Angelil-7/1/1997
697 According to OO's most recent annual report and 10K, Michael Jordan was issSteven J. Tomesko-7/1/1997
696 I was not in OO back then, but if you were, or were thinking of getting in, theBrian C. Lund-7/1/1997
695 Yeah it means something depending on what your plan, time frame, goals are. DoBrian C. Lund-7/1/1997
694 Dear Dave, I think you need to deal with some personal issues. Nobody mentioBrian C. Lund-7/1/1997
693 So Brian, what's your point? just kidding! don't want to cause you aOlivier Resca-6/30/1997
692 The stock is above all three moving averages, does it mean anything, I dont knodave luken-6/30/1997
691 WHO CARES, This a thread for oakley not the "Brian Lund I am a self appoindave luken-6/30/1997
690 Do I lose money using TA? Unfortunately, sometimes I do. And usually the reasBrian C. Lund-6/30/1997
689 What a stupid question, Do you ever lose with TA?. People who make money time odave luken-6/30/1997
688 OK, the verdict has been partially rendered on the Barron's article. SlightDr. Jeff-6/30/1997
687 Bravo Brian, Although I am not as good as I ought to be at TA, I guess most peCornelis van Helden-6/30/1997
686 Nobody said TA moves the stock, fundamentals do. But the point is, YOU DONBrian C. Lund-6/30/1997
685 Just a thought: Michael Jordan will quite likely (90%) be retiring after the 9Dr. Jeff-6/30/1997
684 Jordan is an Oakley board director with a 10 year Oakley endorsement contract fharkenman-6/30/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News