SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
PLFM - Undervalued with great potential
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9096 26 0 PLFM
Emcee:  Rich Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7171 Chris I responded in defense of you only!!!! You did us a big favor by repCapt Ron-3/4/1999
7170 PR is most likely in the works...lol...They might have a little embarrassment tgarz-3/4/1999
7169 Well, well, someone finally figured it out! Of course, we all know Howard wanLuckyLinda-3/4/1999
7168 Maybe I am misunderstanding something here. I must admit I do not have a large DoubleOddBuck-3/4/1999
7167 Chris, Thanks for your report on the conference. I love to get first-hand, facMichael Baron-3/4/1999
7166 There was NO MISINFORMATION...not from ME! I told the story about the Flight/SpSkywatcher-3/4/1999
7165 As I understand, if Co. assets is over $100 million, stock price is not requireFuza-3/4/1999
7164 TO ALL: It seems as if someone only dreamed up a PR for yesterday! Who actuallCapt Ron-3/4/1999
7163 You wont find the Nasdaq granting a listing to a .57 stock. We need to be at I GHart-3/4/1999
7162 Chris....I apology if my posts mistrust you in any way.... I still think this iFuza-3/4/1999
7161 Well Joey....my guess is they want it to Tank, be a good time to clean it up onDoubleOddBuck-3/4/1999
7160 It's still just after 8:00 AM on the west coast. Let's see if they canYour Highness-3/4/1999
7159 Anyone try calling the company? I have been getting the answering machine for JOEY-3/4/1999
7158 The sad part is they don't even have a press release ready for this morninSkywatcher-3/4/1999
7157 Chris....Sorry if posters where unfair in the response to your conclusions mentgarz-3/4/1999
7156 Just to get it straight, Chris, not all of us were childish enough to blame thecliff emohs-3/4/1999
7155 I accept your excuses. No big deal. But I am out of here for a while. Thanks. Akbert-3/4/1999
7154 Sorry Archie... Your post to Steve was not read before I posted my comments...garz-3/4/1999
7153 YOU TELL 'EM CHRIS!!!!!!!!!!! I for one appreciate the time you took to atRory McLeod-3/4/1999
7152 Bruce here one of your check points. 100 shares @.57 traded at 10:30 bid/ask wD Doss-3/4/1999
7151 Chris, I am not the one who did not believe you. You answer the wrong guy. by tkbert-3/4/1999
7150 Take it easy Chris, I simply wanted to hear from you concerning your posting tiGHart-3/4/1999
7149 Screw all you folks...you just don't like my report...sorry I wasted my 4 HSkywatcher-3/4/1999
7148 come on! Is this a tribunal or what ? Yes I was at the same time on RB Did not kbert-3/4/1999
7147 You are absolutely right on the press release. It should have been ready to reYour Highness-3/4/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News