SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Oxford Health Plan (OXHP)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2068 12 0 OXHP
Emcee:  Lee A. Rosin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
718 1mier, pls what is the "POS"-Plan? Thx & Happy New Yr, Thomas -eThomas Haegin-1/6/1998
717 TEchnically speaking.. OXHP looks like it is breaking-out.. iqc.com OpinionsDD™-1/4/1998
716 has anyone seen any insider buying in the last few weeks? i think this will hapgeorge harriman-1/4/1998
715 Mike; I'm sorry that you feel that way. There are many balls in this game. robt justine-1/4/1998
714 Sorry to see that you are leaving. I would not have answered an issue more thanmen mailman-1/4/1998
713 I was in error re: my 10% - it did hit 15.1% of one portfolio, but only 7.05% oMichael Burry-1/4/1998
712 Mike: Your age is starting to show. And I hope, with some restraint, that I wilrobt justine-1/4/1998
711 If OXHP can increase enrollment and hence revenues out of proportion to any incMichael Burry-1/3/1998
710 Jeffrey, if you recorded Wall Street Week, would you please let us know what alLouis Cristiano-1/3/1998
709 <Mike, probably because as you mentioned, you had overloaded your portfolio Michael Burry-1/3/1998
708 Note Bob Stovall one of the yearend show panelists on Friday's Wall Street jeffbas-1/3/1998
707 Mike/Robt: Happy new year. Assuming 1B quarterly revenues and 94% costs, 10%Premier-1/3/1998
706 Tempest in a Teapot-- Part "n" <<If I wanted to say the moves robt justine-1/2/1998
705 When did I become your pal<G>. I am sorry, I was wrong on the response toStephen M. DeMoss-1/2/1998
704 <i>It is not necessary for me to suggest anything. It is there in black aMichael Burry-1/2/1998
703 Michael, although I'm not on familiar ground in responding when someone wanrobt justine-1/2/1998
702 Geez, Robt take a look at my original post - not just the words you took out ofMichael Burry-1/1/1998
701 Sorry pal. The post you refer to was not addressed to Stephen Demoss, but to LPmen mailman-1/1/1998
700 <<if SI is an imperfect medium due to lack of sufficient copy-editing robt justine-1/1/1998
699 Robt, No slipperiness intended. What I intended is what I intended, and if SI Michael Burry-1/1/1998
698 <<So when someone says 10% premium increases will solve the problem then robt justine-1/1/1998
697 Robt, You're just taking things out of context. Of course absolute profitsMichael Burry-1/1/1998
696 <<My point was the change is a zero sum, not the total profit.>> &lrobt justine-1/1/1998
695 Thanks for the kind words/welcome. Im glad I bought the other day (listened to Stephen M. DeMoss-12/31/1997
694 The only thing you have right on my profile is that I am 39. Where did you get Stephen M. DeMoss-12/31/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News