SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
VSIN, Buy Now!!
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
796 1 0 VSIN
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
721 All. It looks like all this Great News is sending VSI down the drain? <b&gRichard Phillips-1/29/1999
720 John.. What are you smoking?? Did I miss something in the News Release?? <Richard Phillips-1/24/1999
719 Walt: I agree: 4th qtr should show improvement over all previous operatiJohn M Connolly-1/24/1999
718 John: I agree that the stock has been trading somewhat predictably and that thWalter Fabisiak-1/24/1999
717 Hi Walt: We are sliding back a little which is to be expected. Whar we need John M Connolly-1/22/1999
716 John: Trading seems to be stabilizing with the market makers narrowing the sprWalter Fabisiak-1/15/1999
715 Ken, Reverse in this case a necessary evil. Initial reaction is bound to be neJohn Rowe-1/15/1999
714 It's trading down, at 1 1/16. From Ken Keatley: Brooke: Anytime TechTrader42-1/15/1999
713 Is anyone getting a quote for the wretched thing today? I'm not -- not evenTechTrader42-1/15/1999
712 Walter. I happen to agree with your statement. I thought we were going to havRichard Phillips-1/15/1999
711 Richard: I too have some expensive ($3.75) stock, but I averaged down when theWalter Fabisiak-1/15/1999
710 Brooke: Given the NASDAQ de-listing situation, the reverse split was inevitablWalter Fabisiak-1/15/1999
709 The interesting thing is the timing of the announcement of the reverse split. ITechTrader42-1/14/1999
708 Sorry for my bluntness...I was just emphasizing the fact that the "split oDavid Helms-1/14/1999
707 Walter. The only problem that I have with this split, is that it will have to Richard Phillips-1/14/1999
706 David: The game is not over. The reverse split was necessary to maintain the Walter Fabisiak-1/14/1999
705 GAME OVER!!! 1 FOR 4 ANNOUNCED!!! biz.yahoo.com Dave!David Helms-1/14/1999
704 Richard: I agree with your assessment of this situation. Once the reverse splWalter Fabisiak-1/13/1999
703 That was my opinion, the Reverse Split. Rp Richard Phillips-1/13/1999
702 how we gonna run this baby up by 300% in a week??? "Reverse split or yoDavid Helms-1/13/1999
701 John. At least they have released some info on this subject. I think that theRichard Phillips-1/13/1999
700 Richard: I would think that we will be getting any news that might move this sJohn M Connolly-1/13/1999
699 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Ken Keatley Director of InvestorRichard Phillips-1/13/1999
698 Walt. I do not think that we will hear any news before Jan-99. I also think Richard Phillips-12/30/1998
697 John: I have heard rumors that the first quarter is shaping up to be a good onWalter Fabisiak-12/30/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):