SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7269Steve - buying LEAPS for Jan 04 150 as in-expensively as possible when the stockSwamp Fox-8/9/2001
7268Basically, for this very short period, I have been neutral. If I had to guess I Arrow Hd.-8/9/2001
7267Swamp, I think you should sell naked calls! Take 9.60 and enjoy life for a whileStephen M. DeMoss-8/9/2001
7266Steve, LIBAJ Jan 2004 options with 150 strike are 9.60 each. If we get routed dSwamp Fox-8/8/2001
7265Arrow, You ask where the stock price will go. When you look at the options, seemStephen M. DeMoss-8/8/2001
7264Hi Wayne, and welcome to the board. I think it will always be worth more than bArrow Hd.-8/8/2001
7263Yes, database, enterprise software and servers to name 3. Services helps fuel prart slott-8/8/2001
7262Good points to ponder. Thanks. Thats total market share right, not just servicWayners-8/7/2001
7261Art, Cnbc did a piece on the 5 tech stocks most likely to advance well once the Stephen M. DeMoss-8/7/2001
7260>>At no growth whats this thing worth....book value? I don't know why art slott-8/7/2001
7259I expect their sales growth to be negative, projecting the downtrend in revenue Wayners-8/7/2001
7258re:One stop shopping for all your IT needs and on a scale that only IBM can provDavesM-8/6/2001
7257Some good discussion going on. I read the Barron's article over the weekendArrow Hd.-8/6/2001
7256I don't know what Barrons said, but I came across this article that talks abkvkkc1-8/5/2001
7255I'm sorry but I don't remember. I read it at Barnes & Noble and onlyStephen M. DeMoss-8/5/2001
7254What are some of the tricks that Barron's accuses IBM of doing?Stephen O-8/4/2001
7253I think the main reason IBM has hung in there (price wise) is that it is a grandStephen M. DeMoss-8/4/2001
7252Here's why IBM deserves to trade at a premium to the market. That and the abart slott-8/4/2001
7251Cisco and IBM: Apples and oranges. In fact Barrons was behind the curve on Ciscoart slott-8/4/2001
7250I know some folks think IBM is invincible, but if I've learned one lesson dukvkkc1-8/4/2001
7249You're right about the money flow. I hold positions in the Aug 105 and 100&kvkkc1-8/4/2001
7248Let me get this straight, IBM (with a PE in the 20's and actual increasing eRobert Scott Diver-8/4/2001
7247The problem with buying puts on IBM is that money seems to flow to it as a type Stephen M. DeMoss-8/4/2001
7246I was mad as hell about Barron's when they came out with the article on CSCOkvkkc1-8/4/2001
7245Art, When does IBM report next. Is it September? Barron's opening article hiStephen M. DeMoss-8/4/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News