SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7394"Big Blue took more than 30 percent of revenue generated by the server markRobert Scott Diver-11/19/2001
7393[WSJ]Tech Center: IBM Takes on Role of Upstart to BEA In Its Battle for Web Softms.smartest.person-11/1/2001
7392Morgan Stanley has a new analyst covering IBM replacing Kraemer who went to merrArrow Hd.-10/31/2001
7391The mainframe lives on! IBM launches speedier version of powerful mainframe By art slott-10/19/2001
7390Intel may have build the market but IBM built Intel, in the early 80's IBM iJohn A. Sebonia-10/19/2001
7389That also seems like it could be a valid way to look at it, at least recently. Charles Tutt-10/18/2001
7388Correction, don't know where the "tyi" came from.Arrow Hd.-10/18/2001
7387tyi Charles, my take is that the share buy-back is funded by free cash flow and Arrow Hd.-10/18/2001
7386Dipy, I'm sure Addi's real concern was the integrity of Reg FD and not Paul Shread-10/18/2001
7385Taken in context of other large IT stocks IBM's results were stellar. IBM eaart slott-10/17/2001
7384The last time I looked at it, my impression was that IBM was taking on debt to bCharles Tutt-10/17/2001
7383Paul: Is it not true that IBM has not grown its revenues for the past four yearsea_biscuit-10/17/2001
7382Addi, Don't know about layoffs - will ask if you really want me to - but esPaul Shread-10/17/2001
7381Paul, Incidentally what happened to your high corporate contact who told you IBuu-10/17/2001
7380Please tell me why you feel IBM's earning were pro-forma. TIA, ScottRobert Scott Diver-10/16/2001
7379FWIW, I think Sun said in a recent conference call that they're not going toCharles Tutt-10/16/2001
7378Away on vacation with limited Internet access. I see that the consensus came doArrow Hd.-10/16/2001
7377So are today's earnings that beat by a penny pro-forma? It looks like it. KeepItSimple-10/16/2001
7376As I understand it, IBM ran their single CPU SPEC benchmarks by disabling in firCharles Tutt-10/16/2001
7375I think that was Sun's response to IBM's announcement. Why no benchmarkCharles Tutt-10/16/2001
7374IMHO CPU peak performance is almost irrelevant. Performance on benchmarks designRobert Scott Diver-10/16/2001
7373can anybody comment on these 2 points (related to POWER4 for High Performance CoJoseph Pareti-10/16/2001
7372Re yawn I can imagine that is what you do while waiting for the results from UlJoseph Pareti-10/16/2001
7371IBM Develops Low-Power Chip Aimed at Extending Battery Life public.wsj.comRobert Scott Diver-10/15/2001
7370IBM Wins Large Wal-Mart Storage Deal, Edges Out EMC dailynews.yahoo.comRobert Scott Diver-10/15/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News