The truth about SI and IHUB | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
The truth about SI and IHUB

An SI Board Since June 2003

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
124	34	0

Emcee: mmmary	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
74	Yes! And thanks for asking. I have new employment, at a place where they make	username	-	6/2/2003
73	Just like the old saying -- the first casualty in investment bulletin board post	ChrisJP	-	6/2/2003
72	Well after reading 71 post I have concluded that this thread is not about SI, no	ChrisJP	-	6/2/2003
71	True, when qualified as an opinion.	David Lawrence	-	6/2/2003
70	An opinion is not slander or libel.	StockDung	-	6/2/2003
69	My only quibble, based on the info I've seen here, is whether the "secu	Sr K	-	6/2/2003
68	Hey Buddy! Howzit goin? trust all is well?	Jorj X Mckie	-	6/2/2003
67	Hey Jorj, how are you?	username	-	6/2/2003
66	Oh, good. Sorry I'm late. <G>	username	-	6/2/2003
65	mmmary, your post which I am replying to fits the legal definition of libel IMHO	username	-	6/2/2003
64	Your wish has already come true.	David Lawrence	1	6/2/2003
63	mmmary, you are incorrect. Prior to any further posts about this little upset yo	username	1	6/2/2003
62	"Let's see if I can anticipate your answer" I wouldn't hold m	bob	-	6/2/2003
61	"The SEC probably just didn't want to go after an underage person."	justaninvestor	-	6/2/2003
60	you should really make an attempt at not being so obtuse. you stated that matt	Jorj X Mckie	-	6/2/2003
59	How do you know? Please post documents which show that bob and matt bought/obtai	mmmary	1	6/2/2003
58	Hey , clam up!	peter michaelson	-	6/2/2003
57	<!-- why not, I have myself on ignore too --> All this ignore business re	Quahog	-	6/2/2003
56	<i>legitimate critic </i> LOL!!! You long ago proved that you have	Jorj X Mckie	1	6/2/2003
55	I did, Glenn I posted about it here even. If anyone has any more info., send it	mmmary	1	6/2/2003
54	I was sued and won you're not listening here. I only post the truth. Anyone	mmmary	1	6/2/2003
53	Those are some very ugly statistics. I would have preferred to not bother think	peter michaelson	-	6/2/2003
52	As far as I'm concerned, I posted the truth. The fact that nobody has sued y	David Lawrence	-	6/2/2003
51	I was once sued for libel and won You should take a look around. A scammy compa	mmmary	1	6/2/2003
50	<i>The SEC probably just didn't want to go after an underage person. N	Glenn Petersen	-	6/2/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):