SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
IPIC
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1359 13 0 IPIC
Emcee:  David D. Long Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
759 Hi Trey! pienso que estamos en la misma honda! No more comments on IPIC. I jusPancho Villa-9/30/1997
758 Pancho, You'd be best to go ahead & cover Tuesday, as I intend Trey Yon-9/30/1997
757 >> However, I just can't agree with a valuation scheme for IPIC basedBanjoman-9/30/1997
756 To ALL!! IPIC is disgustingly technically weak right now! Read Paulo's noernie de la fuente-9/30/1997
755 Fen-Ted (WSJ Editorial. This gets more interesting by the minute. Could not rPancho Villa-9/29/1997
754 Thanks for the lecture on biotech stock valuation for the benefit of all of us Pancho Villa-9/29/1997
753 >>Another down day for ipic. I hope the ipic investors have seen the bottBanjoman-9/29/1997
752 >>2. you are using sales as the foundation of value. One clear sign this Banjoman-9/29/1997
751 Another down day for ipic. I hope the ipic investors have seen the bottom of thHaolin Ni-9/29/1997
750 << Care to explain why you doubt IPIC will be liable?>> I would refWeirdPro Randy-9/29/1997
749 >>A good buying opportunity tomorrow.<< A better one next month, aAndrew H-9/29/1997
748 During last quarter's conference call, IPIC is already training salespersonfar east-9/29/1997
747 Paul, please explain "the cross indemnification was NOT equivalent.",WeirdPro Randy-9/28/1997
746 This is cool! Are you actually implyin g that since the Co's imdemnified eaPancho Villa-9/28/1997
745 Not cancelled out the cross indemnification was NOT equivalent. Why did you gpaul001-9/28/1997
744 Pancho, there is always room for improvement. But I think there are a lot betteAndrew H-9/28/1997
743 "He who gazes into the crystal ball, must learn to eat broken glass".Pancho Villa-9/28/1997
742 Hong-Le, excuse me but this seems to be a very phony way of valuing a companyPancho Villa-9/28/1997
741 Trey, thanks for posting the Barron's piece for everyone's benefit. IgPancho Villa-9/28/1997
740 Are you sure? I believe Citicoline belongs to a Spanish lab. Check the 10K jusPancho Villa-9/28/1997
739 Monday's gonna be a black day for Interneuron, wouldn't be surprised toTrey Yon-9/28/1997
738 Pancho, Although the annual sales of redeux may be more than citicoline, IPIC Hong-Lee Yu-9/28/1997
737 The Barron's article may do some short-term damage, ie for the first few hoWeirdPro Randy-9/28/1997
736 from Kate Wellings editorial: Talk about a bitter pill. We're referring, oTrey Yon-9/28/1997
735 I haven't read Barron's yet. but before I do let me add to the assessmePancho Villa-9/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):